A M Kop1, C Keogh, E Swarts. 1. Department of Medical Engineering and Physics, Royal Perth Hospital, Wellington Street, Perth, 6000, Western Australia, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While modular femoral heads have been used in THA for decades, a recent innovation is a second neck-stem taper junction. Clinical advantages include intraoperative adjustment of leg length, femoral anteversion, and easier revision, all providing flexibility to the surgeon; however, there have been reports of catastrophic fracture, cold welding, and corrosion and fretting of the modular junction. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) the neck-stem junction showed the same degradation mechanisms, if any, as the head-neck junction, (2) the junction contributed to THA revision, (3) the alloy affected the degree of degradation, and (4) the trunion machine finish affected the degradation mechanisms. METHODS: We compared 57 retrievals from seven total hip modular designs, three cobalt-chromium-molybdenum and four titanium based: Bionik(®) (four), GMRS(®) (four), Margron(®) (22), Apex(®) (five), M-series(®) (five), ZMR(®) (two), and S-ROM(®) (15). Macroscopic inspection, microscopy, and micro-CT were conducted to determine the effects of materials and design. RESULTS: The cobalt-chromium-molybdenum components showed crevice corrosion and fretting of the neck-stem taper, whereas the titanium components had less corrosion; however, there were several cases of cold welding where disassembly could not be achieved in theater. CONCLUSIONS: Even with modern taper designs and corrosion-resistant materials, corrosion, fretting, and particulate debris were observed to a greater extent in the second neck-stem junction. Titanium-based modular arthroplasty may lessen the degree of degradation, but cold welding of the components may occur. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Degradation of the second junction contributed to 8 cases of metallosis and two cases of aseptic lymphocyte-laminated vascular-associated lesions contributing to revision.
BACKGROUND: While modular femoral heads have been used in THA for decades, a recent innovation is a second neck-stem taper junction. Clinical advantages include intraoperative adjustment of leg length, femoral anteversion, and easier revision, all providing flexibility to the surgeon; however, there have been reports of catastrophic fracture, cold welding, and corrosion and fretting of the modular junction. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) the neck-stem junction showed the same degradation mechanisms, if any, as the head-neck junction, (2) the junction contributed to THA revision, (3) the alloy affected the degree of degradation, and (4) the trunion machine finish affected the degradation mechanisms. METHODS: We compared 57 retrievals from seven total hip modular designs, three cobalt-chromium-molybdenum and four titanium based: Bionik(®) (four), GMRS(®) (four), Margron(®) (22), Apex(®) (five), M-series(®) (five), ZMR(®) (two), and S-ROM(®) (15). Macroscopic inspection, microscopy, and micro-CT were conducted to determine the effects of materials and design. RESULTS: The cobalt-chromium-molybdenum components showed crevice corrosion and fretting of the neck-stem taper, whereas the titanium components had less corrosion; however, there were several cases of cold welding where disassembly could not be achieved in theater. CONCLUSIONS: Even with modern taper designs and corrosion-resistant materials, corrosion, fretting, and particulate debris were observed to a greater extent in the second neck-stem junction. Titanium-based modular arthroplasty may lessen the degree of degradation, but cold welding of the components may occur. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Degradation of the second junction contributed to 8 cases of metallosis and two cases of aseptic lymphocyte-laminated vascular-associated lesions contributing to revision.
Authors: J P Collier; M B Mayor; I R Williams; V A Surprenant; H P Surprenant; B H Currier Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: J J Jacobs; R M Urban; J L Gilbert; A K Skipor; J Black; M Jasty; J O Galante Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Emmanuel Gibon; Derek F Amanatullah; Florence Loi; Jukka Pajarinen; Akira Nabeshima; Zhenyu Yao; Moussa Hamadouche; Stuart B Goodman Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2016-06-21 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: H John Cooper; Robert M Urban; Richard L Wixson; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Ryan M Shulman; Michael G Zywiel; Rajiv Gandhi; J Roderick Davey; David C Salonen Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 2.199