Literature DB >> 27777916

Result of Modular Necks in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Average Follow-up of Four Years.

Jemin Yi1, Kye Young Han1, Young Jun Nam1, Keun Woo Kim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of modular neck-utilization in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients (34 hips) who had modular stem THA between April 2011 and January 2013 were evaluated. There were 19 men and 11 women with a mean age of 61.2 years at the time of surgery. There were 20 cases of osteonecrosis of femoral head, 7 cases of osteoarthritis, 6 cases of femur neck fracture, and 1 case of rheumatoid arthritis. No patients presented with anatomical deformity of hip. Patients were operated on using a modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach. All patients underwent clinical and radiological follow-up at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months, and every year postoperatively. The mean duration of follow-up was 48.2 months (range, 39 to 59 months).
RESULTS: The average Harris hip score improved from 63.7 to 88.1 at the final follow-up. Radiographically, mean acetabular cup inclination was 45.3°(range, 36°-61°) and anteversion was 21.7°(range, 11°-29°). All were neutral-positioned stems except 5 which were varus-positioned stems. In only 3 cases (8.8%), varus or valgus necks were required. A case of linear femoral fracture occurred intraoperatively and 1 case of dislocation occurred at postoperative 2 weeks. No complications at modular junction were occurred.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the use of modular necks had favorable clinical and radiographic results. This suggests that the use of modular neck in primary THA without anatomical deformity is safe at a follow-up of 39 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Hip; Modular neck; Modular stem; Replacement

Year:  2016        PMID: 27777916      PMCID: PMC5067390          DOI: 10.5371/hp.2016.28.3.142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Pelvis        ISSN: 2287-3260


  28 in total

1.  A comparison of two implant systems in restoration of hip geometry in arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael J Archibeck; Tamara Cummins; Joshua Carothers; Daniel W Junick; Richard E White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A case of disassociation of a modular femoral neck trunion after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Craig DellaValle; Joshua Jacobs; Markus Wimmer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular neck.

Authors:  E Sariali; A Mouttet; G Pasquier; E Durante; Y Catone
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-03

4.  Correlation of corrosion and biomechanics in the retrieval of a single modular neck total hip arthroplasty design: modular neck total hip arthroplasty system.

Authors:  Brent A Lanting; Matthew G Teeter; Edward M Vasarhelyi; Todor G Ivanov; James L Howard; Douglas D R Naudie
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Corrosion and Fretting of a Modular Hip System: A Retrieval Analysis of 60 Rejuvenate Stems.

Authors:  Ivan De Martino; Joseph B Assini; Marcella E Elpers; Timothy M Wright; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The tradeoffs associated with modular hip prostheses.

Authors:  J P Collier; M B Mayor; I R Williams; V A Surprenant; H P Surprenant; B H Currier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Proximal component modularity in THA--at what cost? An implant retrieval study.

Authors:  A M Kop; C Keogh; E Swarts
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Donald S Garbuz; Michael Tanzer; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, controlled, longitudinal study.

Authors:  J J Jacobs; A K Skipor; L M Patterson; N J Hallab; W G Paprosky; J Black; J O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

1.  Midterm outcomes of titanium modular femoral necks in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thurial Collet; Jean-Pierre Atanasiu; Jean-Baptiste de Cussac; Kamal Oufroukhi; Hugo Bothorel; Mo Saffarini; François Badatcheff
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.