Literature DB >> 22038312

Dose verification of IMRT by use of a COMPASS transmission detector.

Yuji Nakaguchi1, Fujio Araki, Masato Maruyama, Shunji Saiga.   

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the fundamental accuracy of reconstructed dose distributions from the COMPASS system using specific MLC test patterns and complicated IMRT neck plans. The COMPASS-reconstructed dose distributions were compared with those measured with EPID, MapCHECK, and EDR2 film and as well as Monte Carlo-calculated dose profiles with use of square-wave chart patterns of 20-, 10-, and 5-mm gaps and step and pyramid patterns. Additionally, the COMPASS dose distributions for clinical IMRT neck plans were tested. The COMPASS dose profiles were almost in agreement with the Monte Carlo-calculated dose profiles and point doses measured with MapCHECK for 20- and 10-mm gap patterns. The dose profile for a 5-mm gap pattern showed a narrow width due to the detector size in the penumbra region. For step and pyramid patterns, COMPASS agreed with MapCHECK and Monte Carlo calculation, except for EDR2 film. The COMPASS and MapCHECK dose distributions agreed with that of a treatment planning system by gamma analysis (criteria; 3 mm/3%). In comparisons of clinical IMRT neck dose distributions, COMPASS was measured with almost the same accuracy as MapCHECK, but slight deviations were found for large IMRT fields. These deviations could be minimized by improvement of the beam model of the COMPASS system. The COMPASS system can be expected to be used for traditional QA methods in clinical routine with the same accuracy as a MapCHECK diode detector.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22038312     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-011-0137-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  14 in total

1.  A 2-D diode array and analysis software for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery.

Authors:  Paul A Jursinic; Ben E Nelms
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluation of Kodak EDR2 film for dose verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered by a static multileaf collimator.

Authors:  X R Zhu; P A Jursinic; D F Grimm; F Lopez; J J Rownd; M T Gillin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Experimental validation of a commercial 3D dose verification system for intensity-modulated arc therapies.

Authors:  Ramesh Boggula; Friedlieb Lorenz; Lutz Mueller; Mattias Birkner; Hansjoerg Wertz; Florian Stieler; Volker Steil; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Predicting energy response of radiographic film in a 6 MV x-ray beam using Monte Carlo calculated fluence spectra and absorbed dose.

Authors:  Asa Palm; Assen S Kirov; Thomas LoSasso
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Patient-specific 3D pretreatment and potential 3D online dose verification of Monte Carlo-calculated IMRT prostate treatment plans.

Authors:  Ramesh Boggula; Lennart Jahnke; Hansjoerg Wertz; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Use of a two-dimensional ionization chamber array for proton therapy beam quality assurance.

Authors:  Bijan Arjomandy; Narayan Sahoo; Xiaoning Ding; Michael Gillin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units.

Authors:  D W Rogers; B A Faddegon; G X Ding; C M Ma; J We; T R Mackie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy: evaluation and comparison of different dosimetric systems.

Authors:  L Masi; F Casamassima; R Doro; P Francescon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dosimetric verification of the dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy of 92 patients.

Authors:  J S Tsai; D E Wazer; M N Ling; J K Wu; M Fagundes; T DiPetrillo; B Kramer; M Koistinen; M J Engler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Experimental investigation of the response of an amorphous silicon EPID to intensity modulated radiotherapy beams.

Authors:  Peter B Greer; Philip Vial; Lyn Oliver; Clive Baldock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  4 in total

1.  Validation of a quick three-dimensional dose verification system for pre-treatment IMRT QA.

Authors:  Yuji Nakaguchi; Fujio Araki; Takeshi Ono; Yuki Tomiyama; Masato Maruyama; Nozomu Nagasue; Yoshinobu Shimohigashi; Yudai Kai
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-09-27

2.  X-Ray Beam Segment Size and Entrance Location Effects on the Integral Quality Monitor (IQM®) Signal and Usefulness in Predicting Complex Segment Output Signals.

Authors:  Mahuvava C; Du Plessis F C P
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-08-01

3.  Dosimetric evaluation of the compass program for patient dose analysis in IMRT delivery quality assurance.

Authors:  Ju-Young Song; Sung-Ja Ahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Critical appraisal of the accuracy of Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm compared to measurement and calculations with the compass system in the delivery of RapidArc clinical plans.

Authors:  Murugesan Kathirvel; Shanmuga Subramanian; Alessandro Clivio; Gandhi Arun; Antonella Fogliata; Giorgia Nicolini; Vellaiyan Subramani; Shanmugam Thirumalai Swamy; Eugenio Vanetti; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.481

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.