Literature DB >> 18072504

Experimental investigation of the response of an amorphous silicon EPID to intensity modulated radiotherapy beams.

Peter B Greer1, Philip Vial, Lyn Oliver, Clive Baldock.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to experimentally determine the difference in response of an amorphous silicon (a-Si) electronic portal imaging device (EPID) to the open and multileaf collimator (MLC) transmitted beam components of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) beams. EPID dose response curves were measured for open and MLC transmitted (MLCtr) 10 x 10 cm2 beams at central axis and with off axis distance using a shifting field technique. The EPID signal was obtained by replacing the flood-field correction with a pixel sensitivity variation matrix correction. This signal, which includes energy-dependent response, was then compared to ion-chamber measurements. An EPID calibration method to remove the effect of beam energy variations on EPID response was developed for IMRT beams. This method uses the component of open and MLCtr fluence to an EPID pixel calculated from the MLC delivery file and applies separate radially dependent calibration factors for each component. The calibration procedure does not correct for scatter differences between ion chamber in water measurements and EPID response; these must be accounted for separately with a kernel-based approach or similar method. The EPID response at central axis for the open beam was found to be 1.28 +/- 0.03 of the response for the MLCtr beam, with the ratio increasing to 1.39 at 12.5 cm off axis. The EPID response to MLCtr radiation did not change with off-axis distance. Filtering the beam with copper plates to reduce the beam energy difference between open and MLCtr beams was investigated; however, these were not effective at reducing EPID response differences. The change in EPID response for uniform sliding window IMRT beams with MLCtr dose components from 0.3% to 69% was predicted to within 2.3% using the separate EPID response calibration factors for each dose component. A clinical IMRT image calibrated with this method differed by nearly 30% in high MLCtr regions from an image calibrated with an open beam calibration factor only. Accounting for the difference in EPID response to open and MLCtr radiation should improve IMRT dosimetry with a-Si EPIDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18072504     DOI: 10.1118/1.2789406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  Dose verification of IMRT by use of a COMPASS transmission detector.

Authors:  Yuji Nakaguchi; Fujio Araki; Masato Maruyama; Shunji Saiga
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-10-26

2.  Overestimation of low-dose radiation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique.

Authors:  Hilke Vorwerk; Daniela Wagner; Björn Seitz; Hans Christiansen; Hendrik A Wolff; Clemens F Hess
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Simple proposal for dosimetry with an Elekta iViewGT™ electronic portal imaging device (EPID) using commercial software modules.

Authors:  Janett Liebich; Jörg Licher; Christian Scherf; Eugen Kara; Nadine Koch; Claus Rödel; Ulla Ramm
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Development of multi-planar dose verification by use of a flat panel EPID for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Yuji Nakaguchi; Fujio Araki; Tomohiro Kouno; Takeshi Ono; Kazunari Hioki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-12-11

5.  Dosimetric properties and clinical application of an a-Si EPID for dynamic IMRT quality assurance.

Authors:  Kenji Matsumoto; Masahiko Okumura; Yoshiyuki Asai; Kouhei Shimomura; Masaya Tamura; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-12-04

6.  Testing the portal imager GLAaS algorithm for machine quality assurance.

Authors:  G Nicolini; E Vanetti; A Clivio; A Fogliata; G Boka; L Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Modulation factors calculated with an EPID-derived MLC fluence model to streamline IMRT/VMAT second checks.

Authors:  Stephen Steciw; Satyapal Rathee; Brad Warkentin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device.

Authors:  Iori Sumida; Hajime Yamaguchi; Indra J Das; Hisao Kizaki; Keiko Aboshi; Mari Tsujii; Yuji Yamada; Osamu Suzuki; Yuji Seo; Fumiaki Isohashi; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  The GLAaS algorithm for portal dosimetry and quality assurance of RapidArc, an intensity modulated rotational therapy.

Authors:  Giorgia Nicolini; Eugenio Vanetti; Alessandro Clivio; Antonella Fogliata; Stine Korreman; Jiri Bocanek; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Dose calibration of EPIDs for segmented IMRT dosimetry.

Authors:  Shrikant Deshpande; Aitang Xing; Lois Holloway; Peter Metcalfe; Philip Vial
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.