Literature DB >> 22037895

Talking about disability in prenatal genetic counseling: a report of two interactive workshops.

Jan Hodgson1, Jon Weil.   

Abstract

Women are commonly offered testing in pregnancy to determine the health of their baby. An important component of informed decision-making about prenatal testing is provision of relevant, accurate, meaningful information concerning the conditions that are being tested for--many of which, such as Down syndrome, are associated with a varying degree of physical and intellectual disability. A range of health professionals, including genetic counselors, may provide information and support throughout the testing process, but available data suggest that discussion of disability is frequently absent or limited. To investigate genetic counselors' perceptions of this situation and identify potential barriers to discussion we facilitated interactive workshops at the 2007 National Society of Genetic Counselors Annual Education Conference (NSGC) and the 2008 European Meeting on Psychosocial Aspects of Genetics (EMPAG). Working groups identified relevant psychosocial issues and impediments to discussion (NSGC) or used a two-part scenario to promote discussion (EMPAG) and reported findings in notes and a closing plenary discussion. Inductive content analysis revealed that participants considered informed decision making to be a major reason for presenting information about disabilities in prenatal genetic counseling and endorsed the value of including information about daily life with Down syndrome and other disabilities. However, they identified three broad types of impediments to such discussion: counseling issues concerning the most appropriate manner to discuss disability under the complex circumstances of prenatal genetic counseling, less than optimal training and experience in addressing these issues, and perceived limitations in the participants' knowledge and understanding of life with disability. Our analysis of the responses from the workshop participants and additional thoughts on these issues have led us to develop recommendations for further research, training and clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22037895     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9410-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  24 in total

1.  Informed consent in the genetic age.

Authors:  A Goldworth
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Descriptive information about Down syndrome: a content analysis of serum screening leaflets.

Authors:  L D Bryant; J Murray; J M Green; J Hewison; I Sehmi; A Ellis
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  "SLANG"--Sensitive Language and the New Genetics--an exploratory study.

Authors:  J Hodgson; E Hughes; C Lambert
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Variation in content in prenatal genetic counseling interviews.

Authors:  B M Burke; A Kolker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Practice variability in prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  E T Matloff
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Women's decision-making in prenatal screening.

Authors:  P Santalahti; E Hemminki; A M Latikka; M Ryynänen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy.

Authors:  A Asch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Women's experience of maternal serum screening.

Authors:  J C Carroll; J B Brown; A J Reid; P Pugh
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: practice observed.

Authors:  T M Marteau; J Slack; J Kidd; R W Shaw
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.427

View more
  7 in total

1.  Commentary: how individual and profession-level factors influence discussion of disability in prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Jan Hodgson; Jon Weil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Perceived relevance of genetic carrier screening: observations of the role of health-related life experiences and stage of life in decision making.

Authors:  Alison D Archibald; Belinda J McClaren
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-11-17

3.  Characterizing Clinical Genetic Counselors' Countertransference Experiences: an Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Rebecca Reeder; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Genetic Counseling, Professional Values, and Habitus: An Analysis of Disability Narratives in Textbooks.

Authors:  Amy R Reed
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2018-12

5.  Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  C Roadhouse; C Shuman; K Anstey; K Sappleton; D Chitayat; E Ignagni
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Negotiating acceptable termination of pregnancy for non-lethal fetal anomaly: a qualitative study of professional perspectives.

Authors:  Lisa Crowe; Ruth H Graham; Stephen C Robson; Judith Rankin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: A qualitative analysis of parental decision making and the implications for healthcare encounters.

Authors:  Robyn Lotto; Lucy K Smith; Natalie Armstrong
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.377

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.