Literature DB >> 1376931

Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: practice observed.

T M Marteau1, J Slack, J Kidd, R W Shaw.   

Abstract

People's knowledge of screening tests for which they are eligible and which they may have undergone is frequently low. The aim of the current study is to determine the extent to which this is due to how a test is offered and explained. Routine consultations (n = 102) between midwives, obstetricians and pregnant women were tape-recorded to determine how a routine screening test for fetal abnormalities (maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein) is presented. The test was presented in the vast majority of consultations. Overall, little information was provided about the test, the conditions screened for, and the meaning of either a positive or a negative result. Screening was presented in such a way as to encourage women to undergo the test. The way in which routine prenatal screening is presented is unlikely to maximise informed decisions about whether to participate in this screening programme. Factors likely to be influencing test presentation include knowledge, attitudes and skills of staff, as well as the attitudes of pregnant women. The results of this study highlight a need to train the heath professionals implementing screening programmes in how to inform people fully about low probability but serious events without alarming them unduly, or reassuring them falsely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1376931     DOI: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80390-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  21 in total

1.  All parents should be given leaflet outlining full details of antenatal screening.

Authors:  W M Moore
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-24

2.  Antenatal screening. Obtaining selective consent to scanning, rather than screening, is possible.

Authors:  C Baillie; J Hewison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-20

3.  Lack of knowledge in health professionals: a barrier to providing information to patients?

Authors:  D K Smith; J Slack; R W Shaw; T M Marteau
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-06

4.  Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of touch screen system with leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests.

Authors:  W Graham; P Smith; A Kamal; A Fitzmaurice; N Smith; N Hamilton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-15

Review 5.  Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Jennifer Irle; Elizabeth Lobb; Kristine Barlow-Stewart
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Using decision analysis to compare policies for antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  J Fletcher; N R Hicks; J D Kay; P A Boyd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-05

7.  Commentary: evidence based information for women is important.

Authors:  M Newburn; M Gready
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-16

8.  Genetic Counseling: Clinical Geneticists' Views.

Authors:  S Michie; J A Smith; J Heaversedge; S Read
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Talking about disability in prenatal genetic counseling: a report of two interactive workshops.

Authors:  Jan Hodgson; Jon Weil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Informed consent to undergo serum screening for Down's syndrome: the gap between policy and practice.

Authors:  D K Smith; R W Shaw; T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.