Literature DB >> 28074313

Characterizing Clinical Genetic Counselors' Countertransference Experiences: an Exploratory Study.

Rebecca Reeder1, Patricia McCarthy Veach2, Ian M MacFarlane3, Bonnie S LeRoy4.   

Abstract

Countertransference (CT) refers to conscious and unconscious emotions, fantasies, behaviors, perceptions, and psychological defenses genetic counselors experience in response to any aspect of genetic counseling situations (Weil 2010). Some authors theorize about the importance of recognizing and managing CT, but no studies solely aim to explore genetic counselors' experiences of the phenomenon. This study examined the extent to which clinical genetic counselors' perceive themselves as inclined to experience CT, gathered examples of CT encountered in clinical situations, and assessed their CT management strategies. An anonymous online survey, sent to NSGC members, yielded 127 usable responses. Participants completed Likert-type items rating their CT propensities; 57 of these individuals also provided examples of CT they experienced in their practice. Factor analysis of CT propensities tentatively suggested four factors: Control, Conflict Avoidance, Directiveness, and Self-Regulation, accounting for 38.5% of response variance. Thematic analysis of CT examples yielded five common triggers: general similarity to patient, medical/genetic similarity, angry patients, patient behaves differently from counselor expectations, and disclosing bad news; six common manifestations: being self-focused, projecting feelings onto the patient, intense emotional reaction to patient, being overly invested, disengagement, and physical reaction; five CT effects: disruption in rapport building, repaired empathy, over-identification, conversation does not reach fullest potential, and counselor is drained emotionally; and three management strategies: recognizing CT as it occurs, self-reflection, and consultation. Results suggest CT is a common experience, occurring in both "routine" and emotionally complex cases. Training programs, continuing education, and peer supervision might include discussion of CT, informed by examples from the present study, to increase genetic counselor awareness and skills for managing the phenomenon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conflict avoidance; Control; Countertransference; Directiveness; Empathy; Genetic counselor; Management strategies; Self-regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28074313     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0063-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  21 in total

1.  Commentary: how individual and profession-level factors influence discussion of disability in prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Jan Hodgson; Jon Weil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Countertransference in the genetic counseling setting: one counselor's personal journey.

Authors:  Jillian Hyatt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Countertransference in successful and unsuccessful cases of psychotherapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Hayes; Dana Lea B Nelson; James Fauth
Journal:  Psychotherapy (Chic)       Date:  2015-03

4.  Does receiving genetic counseling impact genetic counselor practice?

Authors:  Elizabeth Peters; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Erin E Ward; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  When you care enough to do your very best: genetic counselor experiences of compassion fatigue.

Authors:  Lacey G Benoit; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Managing countertransference.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Hayes; Charles J Gelso; Ann M Hummel
Journal:  Psychotherapy (Chic)       Date:  2011-03

8.  When Grief Roars.

Authors:  Sandy Woo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  The psychic costs of empathic engagement: personal and demographic predictors of genetic counselor compassion fatigue.

Authors:  Sharanya Udipi; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Juihsien Kao; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  Analyzing the "nature" and "specific effectiveness" of clinical empathy: a theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory-based research agenda.

Authors:  Melanie Neumann; Jozien Bensing; Stewart Mercer; Nicole Ernstmann; Oliver Ommen; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.