Literature DB >> 22011094

In vitro and in vivo mechanical stability of orthodontic mini-implants.

Il-Sik Cho1, Sung-Kyun Kim, Young-Il Chang, Seung-Hak Baek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare in vivo and in vitro mechanical stability of orthodontic mini-implants (OMIs) treated with a sandblasted, large-grit, and anodic-oxidation (SLAO) method vs those treated with a sandblasted, large-grit, and acid-etching (SLA) method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four titanium OMIs (cylindrical shape, drill-free type; diameter  =  1.45 mm, length  =  8 mm, Biomaterials Korea Inc, Seoul, Korea) were allocated into control, SLA, and SLAO groups (N  =  12 for in vivo and N  =  6 for in vitro studies per group). In vitro study was carried out on a polyurethane foam bone block (Sawbones, Pacific Research Laboratories Inc, Vashon, Wash). In vivo study was performed in the tibias of Beagles (6 males, age  =  1 year, weight  =  10 to 13 kg; OMIs were removed at 8 weeks after installation). For insertion and removal of OMIs, the speed and maximum torque of the surgical engine were set to 30 rpm and 40 Ncm, respectively. Maximum torque (MT), total energy (TE), and near peak energy (NPE) during the insertion and removal procedures were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: In the in vitro study, although the control group had a higher insertion MT value than the SLA and SLAO groups (P < .01), no differences in insertion TE and NPE or in any of the removal variables were noted among the three groups. In the in vivo study, the control group exhibited higher values for all insertion variables compared with the SLA and SLAO groups (MT, P < .001; TE, P < .01; NPE, P < .001). Although no difference in removal TE and removal NPE was noted among the three groups, the SLAO group presented with a higher removal MT than the SLA and control groups (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: SLAO treatment may be an effective tool in reducing insertion damage to surrounding tissue and improving the mechanical stability of OMIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22011094      PMCID: PMC8845555          DOI: 10.2319/071311-447.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  29 in total

1.  Microdamage adjacent to endosseous implants.

Authors:  S S Huja; T R Katona; D B Burr; L P Garetto; W E Roberts
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Chung-Ho Chen; Chao-San Chang; Chi-Hsin Hsieh; Yu-Chuan Tseng; Yee-Shyong Shen; I-Yueh Huang; Chia-Fu Yang; Chun-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant.

Authors:  Mitsuru Motoyoshi; Masayuki Hirabayashi; Miwa Uemura; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Mitsuru Motoyoshi; Tohru Yoshida; Akiko Ono; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region.

Authors:  Cheol-Hyun Moon; Dong-Gun Lee; Hyun-Sun Lee; Jeong-Soo Im; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Impact of implant design on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Benedict Wilmes; Stephanie Ottenstreuer; Yu-Yu Su; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter and length.

Authors:  Seon-A Lim; Jung-Yul Cha; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Rotational resistance of surface-treated mini-implants.

Authors:  Seong-Hun Kim; Shin-Jae Lee; Il-Sik Cho; Seong-Kyun Kim; Tae-Woo Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Microdamage in cortical bone due to the overtightening of orthodontic microscrews.

Authors:  Christian Wawrzinek; Thorsten Sommer; Helge Fischer-Brandies
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Comparison of stability between cylindrical and conical type mini-implants. Mechanical and histological properties.

Authors:  Jong-Wan Kim; Seung-Hak Baek; Tae-Woo Kim; Young-Il Chang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  5 in total

1.  Crystalline Biomimetic Calcium Phosphate Coating on Mini-Pin Implants to Accelerate Osseointegration and Extend Drug Release Duration for an Orthodontic Application.

Authors:  Menghong Li; Gang Wu; Mingjie Wang; Ernst B Hunziker; Yuelian Liu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 5.719

2.  Effects of wobbling angle on the stability measures of orthodontic mini-implants during insertion and removal procedures.

Authors:  Il-Sik Cho; Sang-Ho Baek; Young Ho Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effect of surface treatment on the mechanical stability of orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Yousef Al-Thomali; Sakeenabi Basha; Roshan Noor Mohamed
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Primary stability of self-drilling and self-tapping mini-implant in tibia of diabetes-induced rabbits.

Authors:  Jea-Beom Park; Eun-Young Kim; Janghyun Paek; Yoon-Ah Kook; Do-Min Jeong; Il-Sik Cho; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-05-11

5.  Evaluation of stability of surface-treated mini-implants in diabetic rabbits.

Authors:  Nam-Hee Oh; Eun-Young Kim; Janghyun Paek; Yoon-Ah Kook; Do-Min Jeong; Il-Sik Cho; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-05-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.