Literature DB >> 18385958

Microdamage in cortical bone due to the overtightening of orthodontic microscrews.

Christian Wawrzinek1, Thorsten Sommer, Helge Fischer-Brandies.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The possibility of skeletal anchorage achieved with mini-implants has greatly broadened the spectrum of treatment modalities in orthodontics. Aim of this study was to investigate the microstructural alterations in cortical bone due to overtightening of orthodontic microscrews during the insertion procedure.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: After having prepared three fresh pelvic porcine bone segments and removed the periosteum, we drilled 25 holes 1 mm in diameter into the segments. Using a screwdriver, we then manually inserted a total of 20 orthodontic microscrews from the Aarhus Anchorage System (1.5 mm x 7.7 mm) into the holes: ten screws were inserted about 6.7 mm deep, leaving the last 1 mm of the thread visible outside the bone. The other ten screws were initially inserted 7.7 mm (until the screw thread was no longer visible and the screw neck was slightly touching the cortex). Those last ten screws were then tightened by another quarter-turn. Five drill-holes were left empty, serving as a reference. The three pelvic bone segments were sawed into 25 smaller bone-specimens, 20 segments containing one screw and five with only the drill-hole. They were cortically cross-sectioned and processed for scanning electron microscope analysis. All the microcracks in the peri-implant bone tissue at least 50 microm long were documented for each sample. Statistical analysis was carried out according to the "number of cracks", "accumulated length of all cracks", "maximum radius of crack alteration", and "longest crack". The specimens were then divided into two subgroups according to cortical thickness.
RESULTS: The group of overtightened implants showed higher values in the following categories: number of cracks, accumulated length of all cracks, maximum radius of crack alteration, and longest crack in comparison to the reference samples without screws and the group of less deeply-inserted implants. However, we identified no correlation between cortical thickness and the degree of microdamage.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that there was more microstructural damage in cortical bone due to overtightening through deep insertion of orthodontic microscrews than occurred at the lower insertion depth. Extensive osseous microdamage may detract from the stability of immediately-loaded microscrews and implants due to the bone-remodeling processes initiated by microdamage. The subject of just how serious this potential risk is should be addressed in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18385958     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-008-0742-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  17 in total

1.  Surface characteristics and mechanical behavior of retrieved orthodontic microimplants.

Authors:  Lu Lu; Hyo-Sang Park
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Evaluating miniscrew position using orthopantomograms compared to cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ruth Bennemann; Martin Baxmann; Ludger Keilig; Susanne Reimann; Bert Braumann; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Slow drilling speeds for single-drill implant bed preparation. Experimental in vitro study.

Authors:  R A Delgado-Ruiz; E Velasco Ortega; G E Romanos; S Gerhke; I Newen; J L Calvo-Guirado
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Assessment of cortical bone microdamage following insertion of microimplants using optical coherence tomography: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hemanth Tumkur Lakshmikantha; Naresh Kumar Ravichandran; Mansik Jeon; Jeehyun Kim; Hyo-Sang Park
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018 Nov.       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Experimental investigation of the fracture torque of orthodontic anchorage screws.

Authors:  Susanne Reimann; Mustafa Ayubi; Fraser McDonald; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Why are mini-implants lost: the value of the implantation technique!

Authors:  Fabio Lourenço Romano; Alberto Consolaro
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

7.  Microdamage in the alveolar process of rat maxillae after orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  T M Präger; P Meyer; R Radlanski; P G Jost-Brinkmann; R Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Stability of smooth and rough mini-implants: clinical and biomechanical evaluation - an in vivostudy.

Authors:  Giselle Naback Lemes Vilani; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Carlos Nelson Elias; Cláudia Trindade Mattos
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015-10

9.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the deformation of the human mandible: a preliminary study from the perspective of orthodontic mini-implant stability.

Authors:  Sun-Hye Baek; Hyun-Suk Cha; Jung-Yul Cha; Yoon-Shik Moon; Sang-Jin Sung
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Effects of predrilling depth and implant shape on the mechanical properties of orthodontic mini-implants during the insertion procedure.

Authors:  Keun-Chul Cho; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.