Literature DB >> 10456388

Microdamage adjacent to endosseous implants.

S S Huja1, T R Katona, D B Burr, L P Garetto, W E Roberts.   

Abstract

Intense remodeling occurs in lamellar bone adjacent to osseointegrated endosseous implants. The purpose of this study was to compare microdamage accumulation subsequent to ex vivo fatigue loading of bone that surrounds an endosseous implant, (a) immediately after placement (nonadapted bone) and (b) following a 12 week healing period after placement (adapted bone). We hypothesize that there is less microdamage in the more compliant adapted bone than in the older nonadapted bone. Nonthreaded titanium plasma sprayed (TPS)-coated endosseous implants were placed into dog mid-femoral diaphyses and allowed to heal for 12 weeks. Block sections of bone, each containing one implant, were cut anteroposteriorly, resulting in an implant containing lateral cortex, and a medial cortex that was used for testing the nonadapted specimens. Control specimens (n = 14 each for adapted and nonadapted) were loaded at 0 N. Experimental specimens (n = 13, adapted; n = 14, nonadapted) were loaded at 100 N in cantilever bending for 150,000 cycles at 2 Hz, at 37 degrees C on a Bionix 858 testing machine. Specimens were bulk stained with basic fuchsin and 120-140 microm sections were obtained. Crack numerical density (Cr.Dn = Cr.N/ B.Ar, #/mm2), crack surface density (Cr.S.Dn = Tt.Cr.Le/ B.Ar, mm/mm2), and percent damage area (Dm.Ar = Cr.Ar x 100/B.Ar, mm2/mm2) were measured at x 250. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) were seen for Cr.Dn, Cr.S.Dn, and Dm.Ar on the compressed cortices suggesting that adapted bone near the implant accumulated significantly less microdamage than nonadapted bone. Also, the adapted nonloaded control specimens had approximately 20-fold less damage than the respective nonadapted specimens. This study suggests that the compliant adapted bone adjacent to endosseous implants is relatively resistant to fatigue loads. The high success rates of endosseous implants may be due to the presence of a rapidly remodeling region that maintains tissue compliance and limits microdamage initiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10456388     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00151-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  9 in total

1.  Histomorphometric analysis of microcrack healing after the installation of mini-implants.

Authors:  Soobin Shin; Pan-Soo Park; Seung-Hak Baek; Il-Hyung Yang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  Ultrasonic Evaluation of the Bone-Implant Interface.

Authors:  Yoann Hériveaux; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite for bone repair: an animal study.

Authors:  J Brandt; S Henning; G Michler; W Hein; A Bernstein; M Schulz
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Production and repair of implant-induced microdamage in the cortical bone of goats after long-term estrogen deficiency.

Authors:  Z Yu; G Wang; T Tang; L Fu; X Yu; L Cao; Z Zhu; K Dai; S Qiu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Effect of zoledronic acid on bone healing subsequent to mini-implant insertion.

Authors:  Sarandeep S Huja; Burçak Kaya; X Mo; Andrew M D'Atri; Soledad A Fernandez
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  In vitro and in vivo mechanical stability of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Il-Sik Cho; Sung-Kyun Kim; Young-Il Chang; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Changes in the mechanical properties and composition of bone during microdamage repair.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Xinhua Qu; Zhifeng Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena.

Authors:  M Fraulob; R Vayron; S Le Cann; B Lecuelle; Y Hériveaux; H Albini Lomami; C H Flouzat Lachaniette; G Haïat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Repair of microdamage in osteonal cortical bone adjacent to bone screw.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Tingjun Ye; Lianfu Deng; Jin Shao; Jin Qi; Qi Zhou; Li Wei; Shijing Qiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.