Literature DB >> 21965462

Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.

Kirsten A Koehler1, T Renee Anthony, Michael Van Dyke, John Volckens.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the facing-the-wind sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers as a function of particle phase (solid versus liquid). Samplers examined were the IOM, Button, and a prototype personal high-flow inhalable sampler head (PHISH). The prototype PHISH was designed to interface with the 37-mm closed-face cassette and provide an inhalable sample at 10 l min(-1) of flow. Increased flow rate increases the amount of mass collected during a typical work shift and helps to ensure that limits of detection are met, particularly for well-controlled but highly toxic species. Two PHISH prototypes were tested: one with a screened inlet and one with a single-pore open-face inlet. Personal aerosol samplers were tested on a bluff-body disc that was rotated along the facing-the-wind axis to reduce spatiotemporal variability associated with sampling supermicron aerosol in low-velocity wind tunnels. When compared to published data for facing-wind aspiration efficiency for a mouth-breathing mannequin, the IOM oversampled relative to mannequin facing-the-wind aspiration efficiency for all sizes and particle types (solid and liquid). The sampling efficiency of the Button sampler was closer to the mannequin facing-the-wind aspiration efficiency than the IOM for solid particles, but the screened inlet removed most liquid particles, resulting in a large underestimation compared to the mannequin facing-the-wind aspiration efficiency. The open-face PHISH results showed overestimation for solid particles and underestimation for liquid particles when compared to the mannequin facing-the-wind aspiration efficiency. Substantial (and statistically significant) differences in sampling efficiency were observed between liquid and solid particles, particularly for the Button and screened-PHISH, with a majority of aerosol mass depositing on the screened inlets of these samplers. Our results suggest that large droplets have low penetration efficiencies through screened inlets and that particle bounce, for solid particles, is an important determinant of aspiration and sampling efficiencies for samplers with screened inlets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21965462      PMCID: PMC4776657          DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mer077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  24 in total

1.  Performance characteristics of the button personal inhalable aerosol sampler.

Authors:  V Aizenberg; S A Grinshpun; K Willeke; J Smith; P A Baron
Journal:  AIHAJ       Date:  2000 May-Jun

2.  The impact of a change to inhalable occupational exposure limits: strontium chromate exposure in the U.S. Air Force.

Authors:  Gary N Carlton
Journal:  AIHA J (Fairfax, Va)       Date:  2003 May-Jun

3.  A field comparison of the IOM inhalable aerosol sampler and a modified 37-mm cassette.

Authors:  R E Clinkenbeard; E C England; D L Johnson; N A Esmen; T A Hall
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2002-09

4.  Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.

Authors:  O Witschger; S A Grinshpun; S Fauvel; G Basso
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2004-03-02

5.  On wiping the interior walls of 37-mm closed-face cassettes: an OSHA perspective.

Authors:  Warren Hendricks; Fern Stones; Dean Lillquist
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Internal wall losses of pharmaceutical dusts during closed-face, 37-mm polystyrene cassette sampling.

Authors:  M A Puskar; J M Harkins; J D Moomey; L H Hecker
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1991-07

7.  Exposures to inhalable and "total" oil mist aerosol by metal machining shop workers.

Authors:  P W Wilsey; J H Vincent; M J Bishop; L M Brosseau; I A Greaves
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1996-12

8.  A collaborative European study of personal inhalable aerosol sampler performance.

Authors:  L C Kenny; R Aitken; C Chalmers; J F Fabriès; E Gonzalez-Fernandez; H Kromhout; G Lidén; D Mark; G Riediger; V Prodi
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1997-04

9.  Size distribution of chromate paint aerosol generated in a bench-scale spray booth.

Authors:  Rania A Sabty-Daily; William C Hinds; John R Froines
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2004-12-13

10.  Controlling health risks from workplace exposure to metalworking fluids in the United Kingdom engineering industry.

Authors:  Martin A Stear
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2003-11
View more
  11 in total

1.  Sampling efficiency of modified 37-mm sampling cassettes using computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Darrah Sleeth; John Volckens
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.

Authors:  Hamza Mbareche; Marc Veillette; Guillaume J Bilodeau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  A Simple and Disposable Sampler for Inhalable Aerosol.

Authors:  Christian L'Orange; Kimberly Anderson; Darrah Sleeth; T Renée Anthony; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-10-14

4.  Size-Selective Sampling Performance of Six Low-Volume "Total" Suspended Particulate (TSP) Inlets.

Authors:  Robert W Vanderpool; Jonathan D Krug; Surender Kaushik; Jerome Gilberry; Andrew Dart; Carlton L Witherspoon
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.908

5.  Performance of prototype high-flow inhalable dust sampler in a livestock production facility.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Changjie Cai; John Mehaffy; Darrah Sleeth; John Volckens
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Revisiting the size selective performance of EPA's high-volume total suspended particulate matter (Hi-Vol TSP) sampler.

Authors:  Jonathan D Krug; Andrew Dart; Carlton L Witherspoon; Jerome Gilberry; Quentin Malloy; Surender Kaushik; Robert W Vanderpool
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Development of Polydisperse Aerosol Generation and Measurement Procedures for Wind Tunnel Evaluation of Size-Selective Aerosol Samplers.

Authors:  Andrew Dart; Jonathan D Krug; Carlton L Witherspoon; Jerome Gilberry; Quentin Malloy; Surender Kaushik; Robert W Vanderpool
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 8.  New Methods for Personal Exposure Monitoring for Airborne Particles.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

9.  Assessment of increased sampling pump flow rates in a disposable, inhalable aerosol sampler.

Authors:  Justin Stewart; Darrah K Sleeth; Rod G Handy; Leon F Pahler; T Renee Anthony; John Volckens
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Airborne Influenza A Is Detected in the Personal Breathing Zone of Swine Veterinarians.

Authors:  Kate M O'Brien; Matthew W Nonnenmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.