Literature DB >> 32025079

Revisiting the size selective performance of EPA's high-volume total suspended particulate matter (Hi-Vol TSP) sampler.

Jonathan D Krug1, Andrew Dart2, Carlton L Witherspoon3, Jerome Gilberry2,3, Quentin Malloy2, Surender Kaushik1, Robert W Vanderpool1.   

Abstract

Under the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for airborne lead, measurements are conducted by means of a high-volume total suspended particulate matter (Hi-Vol TSP) sampler. In the decade between 1973 and 1983, there were 12 publications that explored the sampling characteristics and effectiveness of the Hi-Vol TSP, yet there persists uncertainty regarding its performance. This article presents an overview of the existing literature on the performance of the Hi-Vol TSP, and identifies the reported sampler effectiveness with respect to four factors: particle size (reported effectiveness of 7%-100%), wind speed (-36% to 100%), sampler orientation (7%-100%), and operational state (107%-140%). Effectiveness of the Hi-Vol TSP was evaluated with a solid, polydisperse aerosol in a controlled wind tunnel setting. Isokinetic samplers were deployed alongside the Hi-Vol TSP to investigate three wind speeds (2, 8, and 24 km h-1), three sampler orientations (0°, 45°, 90°), and two operational states (on, off) for aerosols with aerodynamic diameters from 5 to 35 μm. Results indicate that particle diameter was the largest determining factor of effectiveness followed by wind speed. Orientation of the sampler did not have a significant effect at 2 and 8 km h-1 but did at 24 km h-1. In a passive state, the Hi-Vol TSP was collected between 1% and 7% of available aerosol depending on particle size and wind speed. Results of this research do not invalidate results of previous studies but rather contribute to our overall understanding of the Hi-Vol TSP's size-selective performance. While results generally agreed with previous studies, the Hi-Vol TSP was found to exhibit less dependence on these four factors than previously reported.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 32025079      PMCID: PMC7001320          DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2017.1316358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol        ISSN: 0278-6826            Impact factor:   2.908


  4 in total

1.  Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; T Renee Anthony; Michael Van Dyke; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-09-29

2.  TETRA-ETHYL LEAD AND THE PUBLIC HEALTH.

Authors:  J H Shrader
Journal:  Am J Public Health (N Y)       Date:  1925-03

3.  A field intercomparison and fundamental characterization of various dust samplers with a reference sampler.

Authors:  W Holländer; G Morawietz; D Bake; L Laskus; B G van Elzakker; A van der Meulen; K H Zierock
Journal:  J Air Waste Manage Assoc       Date:  1990-06

4.  Collaborative testing of methods to measure air pollutants. I. The high-volume method for suspended particulate matter.

Authors:  H C McKee; R E Childers; O Saenz; T W Stanley; J H Margeson
Journal:  J Air Pollut Control Assoc       Date:  1972-05
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Development of Polydisperse Aerosol Generation and Measurement Procedures for Wind Tunnel Evaluation of Size-Selective Aerosol Samplers.

Authors:  Andrew Dart; Jonathan D Krug; Carlton L Witherspoon; Jerome Gilberry; Quentin Malloy; Surender Kaushik; Robert W Vanderpool
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  An experimental method for efficiently evaluating the size-resolved sampling efficiency of liquid-absorption aerosol samplers.

Authors:  Jianshu Guo; Xinying Zheng; Tongtong Qin; Meng Lv; Wei Zhang; Xiaolin Song; Hongying Qiu; Lingfei Hu; Lili Zhang; Dongsheng Zhou; Yansong Sun; Wenhui Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.