Literature DB >> 15596421

Size distribution of chromate paint aerosol generated in a bench-scale spray booth.

Rania A Sabty-Daily1, William C Hinds, John R Froines.   

Abstract

Spray painters are potentially exposed to aerosols containing hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] via inhalation of chromate-based paint sprays. Evaluating the particle size distribution of a paint spray aerosol, and the variables that may affect this distribution, is necessary to determine the site and degree of respiratory deposition and the damage that may result from inhaled Cr(VI)-containing paint particles. This study examined the effect of spray gun atomization pressure, aerosol generation source and aerosol aging on the size distribution of chromate-based paint overspray aerosols generated in a bench-scale paint spray booth. The study also determined the effect of particle bounce inside a Marple personal cascade impactor on measured size distributions of paint spray aerosols. Marple personal cascade impactors with a modified inlet were used for sample collection. The data indicated that paint particle bounce did not occur inside the cascade impactors sufficiently to affect size distribution when using uncoated stainless steel or PVC substrate sampling media. A decrease in paint aerosol mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) from 8.2 to 7.0 mum was observed as gun atomization pressure increased from 6 to 10 psi. Overspray aerosols were sampled at two locations in the spray booth. A downstream sampling position simulated the exposure of a worker standing between the painted surface and exhaust, a situation encountered in booths with multiple workers. The measured mean MMAD was 7.2 mum. The distance between the painted surface and sampler was varied to sample oversprays of varying ages between 2.8 and 7.7 s. Age was not a significant factor for determining MMAD. Overspray was sampled at a 90 degrees position to simulate a worker standing in front of the surface being painted with air flowing to the worker's side, a common situation in field applications. The resulting overspray MMAD averaged 5.9 mum. Direct-spray aerosols were sampled at ages from 5.3 to 11.7 s. Overspray and direct-spray results indicated that most of the change in aerosol size distribution occurred between the time the paint aerosol impacted the painted surface and the time the overspray became 2.8 s old. The overall mean MMAD of overspray in the study was 6.4 mum and may have been underestimated due to sampling efficiency biases. If inhaled by a worker, the overspray aerosols evaluated in this study would mostly deposit in the head airways region of the respiratory tract. Paint overspray aerosols contained Cr primarily in the Cr(VI) state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15596421     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meh080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  4 in total

1.  Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; T Renee Anthony; Michael Van Dyke; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-09-29

2.  Exposure to airborne particles and volatile organic compounds from polyurethane molding, spray painting, lacquering, and gluing in a workshop.

Authors:  Bjarke Mølgaard; Anna-Kaisa Viitanen; Anneli Kangas; Marika Huhtiniemi; Søren Thor Larsen; Esa Vanhala; Tareq Hussein; Brandon E Boor; Kaarle Hämeri; Antti Joonas Koivisto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Granulometric characterization of airborne particulate release during spray application of nanoparticle-doped coatings.

Authors:  Daniel Göhler; Michael Stintz
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Lung cancer risk in painters: results from the SYNERGY pooled case-control study consortium.

Authors:  Neela Guha; Liacine Bouaoun; Hans Kromhout; Roel Vermeulen; Thomas Brüning; Thomas Behrens; Susan Peters; Véronique Luzon; Jack Siemiatycki; Mengting Xu; Benjamin Kendzia; Pascal Guenel; Danièle Luce; Stefan Karrasch; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; Dario Consonni; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil E Caporaso; Per Gustavsson; Nils Plato; Franco Merletti; Dario Mirabelli; Lorenzo Richiardi; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Wolfgang Ahrens; Hermann Pohlabeln; Lap Ah Tse; Ignatius Tak-Sun Yu; Adonina Tardón; Paolo Boffetta; David Zaridze; Andrea 't Mannetje; Neil Pearce; Michael P A Davies; Jolanta Lissowska; Beata Świątkowska; John McLaughlin; Paul A Demers; Vladimir Bencko; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; Tamás Pándics; Eleonora Fabianova; Dana Mates; Francesco Forastiere; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Joachim Schüz; Kurt Straif; Ann Olsson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.402

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.