Literature DB >> 10885891

Performance characteristics of the button personal inhalable aerosol sampler.

V Aizenberg1, S A Grinshpun, K Willeke, J Smith, P A Baron.   

Abstract

The button inhalable aerosol sampler with a curved porous inlet recently was developed and evaluated as a stationary sampler in the laboratory and in the field. The present study focused on investigating its suitability for personal inhalable aerosol sampling. The button sampler was tested at two wind velocities (0.5 and 2.0 m/sec), three particle sizes (7, 29, and 70 microm) and three orientations to the wind (0, 90, and 180 degrees). The performance characteristics of the button sampler were compared with those of three other personal samplers--the IOM (Institute of Occupational Medicine), GSP, and 37-mm closed-face filter cassette. The experiments were conducted in a wind tunnel with the samplers mounted on a full-size manikin. The direction-specific sampling efficiency of the button sampler was found to be essentially independent of the wind direction and dependent on the wind velocity to a much smaller degree than that of the three other samplers. When direction-averaged, the fit of its sampling efficiency curve to the inhalability curve was found to be better than that of the 37-mm closed-face cassette, comparable with that of the GSP sampler, and less than that of the IOM sampler. The precision of the button sampler was found to be generally equal to or better than the precision of the comparison samplers. It was concluded that the button sampler can be successfully used as a personal inhalable aerosol sampler.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10885891     DOI: 10.1080/15298660008984550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIHAJ        ISSN: 1529-8663


  18 in total

1.  Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; T Renee Anthony; Michael Van Dyke; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-09-29

2.  Use of a robotic sampling platform to assess young children's exposure to indoor bioaerosols.

Authors:  Z Wang; S L Shalat; K Black; P J Lioy; A A Stambler; O H Emoekpere; M Hernandez; T Han; M Ramagopal; G Mainelis
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 5.770

3.  Field and wind tunnel comparison of four aerosol samplers using agricultural dusts.

Authors:  Stephen J Reynolds; Jason Nakatsu; Marvin Tillery; Thomas Keefe; John Mehaffy; Peter S Thorne; Kelley Donham; Matthew Nonnenmann; Vijay Golla; Patrick O'shaughnessy
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-05-14

4.  Comparison of particulate matter exposure estimates in young children from personal sampling equipment and a robotic sampler.

Authors:  Jessica A Sagona; Stuart L Shalat; Zuocheng Wang; Maya Ramagopal; Kathleen Black; Marta Hernandez; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Electrostatic dust collectors compared to inhalable samplers for measuring endotoxin concentrations in farm homes.

Authors:  B Kilburg-Basnyat; T M Peters; S S Perry; P S Thorne
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.770

6.  Performance of prototype high-flow inhalable dust sampler in a livestock production facility.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Changjie Cai; John Mehaffy; Darrah Sleeth; John Volckens
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Development of Polydisperse Aerosol Generation and Measurement Procedures for Wind Tunnel Evaluation of Size-Selective Aerosol Samplers.

Authors:  Andrew Dart; Jonathan D Krug; Carlton L Witherspoon; Jerome Gilberry; Quentin Malloy; Surender Kaushik; Robert W Vanderpool
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.908

8.  Release of free DNA by membrane-impaired bacterial aerosols due to aerosolization and air sampling.

Authors:  Huajun Zhen; Taewon Han; Donna E Fennell; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Analysis of airborne microbial communities using 16S ribosomal RNA: Potential bias due to air sampling stress.

Authors:  Huajun Zhen; Valdis Krumins; Donna E Fennell; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Exposure to dust and endotoxin of employees in cucumber and tomato nurseries.

Authors:  A M Madsen; V M Hansen; S H Nielsen; T T Olsen
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2008-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.