Literature DB >> 9155236

A collaborative European study of personal inhalable aerosol sampler performance.

L C Kenny1, R Aitken, C Chalmers, J F Fabriès, E Gonzalez-Fernandez, H Kromhout, G Lidén, D Mark, G Riediger, V Prodi.   

Abstract

Following the adoption of new international sampling conventions for inhalable, thoracic and respirable aerosol fractions, a working group of Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN) drafted a standard for the performance of workplace aerosol sampling instruments. The present study was set up to verify the experimental, statistical and mathematical procedures recommended in the draft performance standard and to check that they could be applied to inhalable aerosol samplers. This was achieved by applying the tests to eight types of personal inhalable aerosol sampler commonly used for workplace monitoring throughout Europe. The study led to recommendations for revising the CEN draft standard, in order to simplify the tests and reduce their cost. However, some further work will be needed to develop simpler test facilities and methods. Several of the samplers tested were found to perform adequately with respect to the inhalable sampling convention, at least over a limited range of typical workplace conditions. In general the samplers were found to perform best in low external wind speeds, which are the test conditions thought to be closest to those normally found in indoor workplaces. The practical implementation of the CEN aerosol sampling conventions requires decisions on which sampling instruments to use, estimation of the likely impact that changing sampling methods could have on apparent exposures, and adjustment where necessary of exposure limit values. The sampler performance data obtained in this project were affected by large experimental errors, but are nevertheless a useful input to decisions on how to incorporate the CEN inhalable sampling convention into regulation, guidance and occupational hygiene practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9155236     DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4878(96)00034-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  30 in total

1.  Epidemiological survey of workers exposed to inorganic germanium compounds.

Authors:  B Swennen; A Mallants; H A Roels; J P Buchet; A Bernard; R R Lauwerys; D Lison
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Exposure related mutagens in urine of rubber workers associated with inhalable particulate and dermal exposure.

Authors:  R Vermeulen; R P Bos; J Pertijs; H Kromhout
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; T Renee Anthony; Michael Van Dyke; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-09-29

4.  Design and computational fluid dynamics investigation of a personal, high flow inhalable sampler.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Andrea C Landázuri; Mike Van Dyke; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-04-23

5.  A rotating bluff-body disc for reduced variability in wind tunnel aerosol studies.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; T Renee Anthony; Michael van Dyke; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-11-22

6.  Sampling efficiency of modified 37-mm sampling cassettes using computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Darrah Sleeth; John Volckens
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Historical limitations of determinant based exposure groupings in the rubber manufacturing industry.

Authors:  R Vermeulen; H Kromhout
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Field comparison of inhalable aerosol samplers applied in the european rubber manufacturing industry.

Authors:  Frank de Vocht; Daan Huizer; Maarten Prause; Kristina Jakobsson; Beata Peplonska; Kurt Straif; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Field and wind tunnel comparison of four aerosol samplers using agricultural dusts.

Authors:  Stephen J Reynolds; Jason Nakatsu; Marvin Tillery; Thomas Keefe; John Mehaffy; Peter S Thorne; Kelley Donham; Matthew Nonnenmann; Vijay Golla; Patrick O'shaughnessy
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-05-14

Review 10.  A comprehensive review of levels and determinants of personal exposure to dust and endotoxin in livestock farming.

Authors:  Ioannis Basinas; Torben Sigsgaard; Hans Kromhout; Dick Heederik; Inge M Wouters; Vivi Schlünssen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.