Literature DB >> 21949358

Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding.

Wonjung Kim1, Tristan Gilet, John W M Bush.   

Abstract

Nectar drinkers must feed quickly and efficiently due to the threat of predation. While the sweetest nectar offers the greatest energetic rewards, the sharp increase of viscosity with sugar concentration makes it the most difficult to transport. We here demonstrate that the sugar concentration that optimizes energy transport depends exclusively on the drinking technique employed. We identify three nectar drinking techniques: active suction, capillary suction, and viscous dipping. For each, we deduce the dependence of the volume intake rate on the nectar viscosity and thus infer an optimal sugar concentration consistent with laboratory measurements. Our results provide the first rationale for why suction feeders typically pollinate flowers with lower sugar concentration nectar than their counterparts that use viscous dipping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21949358      PMCID: PMC3189050          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1108642108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  Nectar feeding by the hovering hawk moth Macroglossum stellatarum: intake rate as a function of viscosity and concentration of sucrose solutions.

Authors:  R B Josens; W M Farina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Effects of nectar volume and concentration on sugar intake rates of Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae).

Authors:  R J Mitchell; D C Paton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Suction feeding in orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini).

Authors:  Brendan J Borrell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Experimental study on the fluid mechanics of blood sucking in the proboscis of a female mosquito.

Authors:  Sang Joon Lee; Bo Heum Kim; Jung Yeop Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Energetics and pollination ecology.

Authors:  B Heinrich; P H Raven
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The hummingbird tongue is a fluid trap, not a capillary tube.

Authors:  Alejandro Rico-Guevara; Margaret A Rubega
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  On the mechanics and energetics of nectar feeding in butterflies.

Authors:  J G Kingsolver; T L Daniel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1979-01-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Respiratory muscle performance in normal elderly subjects and patients with COPD.

Authors:  N J Morrison; J Richardson; L Dunn; R L Pardy
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Dilute bird nectars: viscosity constrains food intake by licking in a sunbird.

Authors:  Angela Köhler; Carolina D C Leseigneur; Luke Verburgt; Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Fluid intake rates in ants correlate with their feeding habits.

Authors:  J Paul; F Roces
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.354

View more
  35 in total

1.  Hummingbird feeding mechanics: comments on the capillarity model.

Authors:  Alejandro Rico-Guevara; Margaret A Rubega
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Specialized bat tongue is a hemodynamic nectar mop.

Authors:  Cally J Harper; Sharon M Swartz; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Evolutionary ecology of nectar.

Authors:  Amy L Parachnowitsch; Jessamyn S Manson; Nina Sletvold
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  The hummingbird's tongue: a self-assembling capillary syphon.

Authors:  Wonjung Kim; François Peaudecerf; Maude W Baldwin; John W M Bush
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The mechanics of nectar offloading in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris and implications for optimal concentrations during nectar foraging.

Authors:  Jonathan G Pattrick; Hamish A Symington; Walter Federle; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Micro-organisms behind the pollination scenes: microbial imprint on floral nectar sugar variation in a tropical plant community.

Authors:  A Canto; C M Herrera
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  The psychophysics of sugar concentration discrimination and contrast evaluation in bumblebees.

Authors:  Vladislav Nachev; James D Thomson; York Winter
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Dogs lap using acceleration-driven open pumping.

Authors:  Sean Gart; John J Socha; Pavlos P Vlachos; Sunghwan Jung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Sucking or lapping: facultative feeding mechanisms in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Jiangkun Wei; Zixin Huo; Stanislav N Gorb; Alejandro Rico-Guevara; Zhigang Wu; Jianing Wu
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Nectar composition in moth-pollinated Platanthera bifolia and P. chlorantha and its importance for reproductive success.

Authors:  Emilia Brzosko; Andrzej Bajguz
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.