Literature DB >> 20686174

Dilute bird nectars: viscosity constrains food intake by licking in a sunbird.

Angela Köhler1, Carolina D C Leseigneur, Luke Verburgt, Susan W Nicolson.   

Abstract

Floral nectars of bird-pollinated plants are relatively dilute. One hypothesis proposed to explain this concerns the difficulty for birds of drinking nectar of high viscosity. We examined the effects of viscosity, separately from those of sugar concentration, on feeding by captive whitebellied sunbirds (Cinnyris talatala). Viscosities of artificial nectar (sucrose solutions ranging in concentration from 0.25 to 1.5 mol/l) were altered with Tylose, an inert polysaccharide. Food consumption was measured over 3 h, and lick frequency and duration were recorded using photodetection devices on feeding apertures too small for the bill but large enough for the extended tongue. Volumetric intake rates (ml/s) were inversely proportional to nectar viscosity, and were similar over the range of sucrose concentrations when viscosity was held constant. Sucrose intake rates (mg/s) remained the same on pure sucrose solutions, but they decreased with increasing viscosity at a constant sucrose concentration. Lick frequencies and tongue loads were reduced at high viscosities, and lick duration increased, which confirms that sunbirds take longer to ingest viscous solutions. Licking behavior was remarkably similar in birds feeding on different sucrose concentrations if viscosity was held constant. Nectar ingestion rate is determined by viscosity; however, total food intake is mainly modulated by sugar concentration. Similar effects of food viscosity have been observed in insects that suck nectar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20686174     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00208.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  8 in total

1.  Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding.

Authors:  Wonjung Kim; Tristan Gilet; John W M Bush
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The hummingbird tongue is a fluid trap, not a capillary tube.

Authors:  Alejandro Rico-Guevara; Margaret A Rubega
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The hummingbird's tongue: a self-assembling capillary syphon.

Authors:  Wonjung Kim; François Peaudecerf; Maude W Baldwin; John W M Bush
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Adaptation for rodent pollination in Leucospermum arenarium (Proteaceae) despite rapid pollen loss during grooming.

Authors:  Christopher Michael Johnson; Anton Pauw
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Asymmetric competition for nectar between a large nectar thief and a small pollinator: an energetic point of view.

Authors:  Eliška Padyšáková; Jan Okrouhlík; Mark Brown; Michael Bartoš; Štěpán Janeček
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Honeybees prefer warmer nectar and less viscous nectar, regardless of sugar concentration.

Authors:  Susan W Nicolson; Leo de Veer; Angela Köhler; Christian W W Pirk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Regulation of nutrient intake in nectar-feeding birds: insights from the geometric framework.

Authors:  Angela Köhler; David Raubenheimer; Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.200

8.  The psychophysics of sugar concentration discrimination and contrast evaluation in bumblebees.

Authors:  Vladislav Nachev; James D Thomson; York Winter
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.084

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.