Literature DB >> 22160117

Effects of nectar volume and concentration on sugar intake rates of Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae).

R J Mitchell1, D C Paton.   

Abstract

Sugar intake rates of captive Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae) feeding at artificial flowers varied across species, and as a function of nectar volume and concentration within each species. Red Wattlebirds (Anthochaera carunculata, 110 g), achieved higher intake rates than New Holland Honeyeaters (Phylidonyris novaehollandiae, 20 g), and both achieved higher rates than Eastern Spinebills (Acanthorhynchus tenuirostris, 10 g). These results reflect differences in bill and tongue dimensions as well as in body mass. Sugar intake rates for all three species increased with volume (5-50 μl) at any given concentration (10-60% mass/mass sucrose). For a given volume, sugar intake rates peaked at intermediate concentrations: 40-50% for the two larger species, and 30-40% for the smallest species. Published studies for other nectarivores foraging at unlimited volume feeders also show optimal nectar concentrations of 30-50%. However, biophysical theory predicts optima at 20-26% for small volumes, and plants presumed to be adapted for bird-pollination often have dilute nectar (20-30%). To explore this discrepancy further, we presented New Holland Honeyeaters with a range of sucrose concentrations (10-50%) using two presentation schemes. In the first we varied concentration but kept volume constant, thus varying gross sugar reward available in each concentration. This gave maximum sugar intake rates at 50%. In the second we varied both volume and concentration so that gross sugar rewards were equal for all solutions, decoupling high concentrations and large sugar rewards. This gave optima at 20%. We argue that variation among plants in nature more closely resembles the latter, "equal sugar presentation" scheme, and therefore, that dilute nectars may indeed represent adaptations for bird pollination.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 22160117     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Energetics and pollination ecology.

Authors:  B Heinrich; P H Raven
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Nectar extraction by hummingbirds: response to different floral characters.

Authors:  Robert D Montgomerie
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Energy intake rates and nectar concentration preferences by hummingbirds.

Authors:  Staffan Tamm; Clifton Lee Gass
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Flower handling efficiency of bumble bees: morphological aspects of probing time.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Optimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars -dependence on sugar intake efficiency and foraging costs.

Authors:  Amy J Heyneman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Pollen carryover, nectar rewards, and pollinator behavior with special reference to Diervilla lonicera.

Authors:  James D Thomson; R C Plowright
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Mechanical determinants of nectar feeding strategy in hummingbirds: energetics, tongue morphology, and licking behavior.

Authors:  Joel G Kingsolver; Thomas L Daniel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Effects of nectar concentration on butterfly feeding: measured feeding rates for Thymelicus lineola (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) and a general feeding model for adult Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Kenneth A Pivnick; Jeremy N McNeil
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Nectar Characteristics and food selection by hummingbirds.

Authors:  F Reed Haisworth; Larry L Wolf
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Coevolution of foraging in bombus and nectar dispensing in chilopsis: a last dreg theory.

Authors:  T G Whitham
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-08-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding.

Authors:  Wonjung Kim; Tristan Gilet; John W M Bush
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The hummingbird's tongue: a self-assembling capillary syphon.

Authors:  Wonjung Kim; François Peaudecerf; Maude W Baldwin; John W M Bush
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The intake responses of three species of leaf-nosed Neotropical bats.

Authors:  Jorge Ayala-Berdon; Jorge E Schondube; Kathryn E Stoner; Nelly Rodriguez-Peña; Carlos Martínez Del Río
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Functional constraints on the evolution of long butterfly proboscides: lessons from Neotropical skippers (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae).

Authors:  J A S Bauder; L Morawetz; A D Warren; H W Krenn
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Floral nectary, nectar production dynamics and chemical composition in five nocturnal Oenothera species (Onagraceae) in relation to floral visitors.

Authors:  Sebastian Antoń; Elwira Komoń-Janczara; Bożena Denisow
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Patterns of floral nectar standing crops allow plants to manipulate their pollinators.

Authors:  Graham H Pyke; John R M Kalman; Dayanne M Bordin; Lucas Blanes; Philip A Doble
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.