Literature DB >> 21536916

The hummingbird tongue is a fluid trap, not a capillary tube.

Alejandro Rico-Guevara1, Margaret A Rubega.   

Abstract

Hummingbird tongues pick up a liquid, calorie-dense food that cannot be grasped, a physical challenge that has long inspired the study of nectar-transport mechanics. Existing biophysical models predict optimal hummingbird foraging on the basis of equations that assume that fluid rises through the tongue in the same way as through capillary tubes. We demonstrate that the hummingbird tongue does not function like a pair of tiny, static tubes drawing up floral nectar via capillary action. Instead, we show that the tongue tip is a dynamic liquid-trapping device that changes configuration and shape dramatically as it moves in and out of fluids. We also show that the tongue-fluid interactions are identical in both living and dead birds, demonstrating that this mechanism is a function of the tongue structure itself, and therefore highly efficient because no energy expenditure by the bird is required to drive the opening and closing of the trap. Our results rule out previous conclusions from capillarity-based models of nectar feeding and highlight the necessity of developing a new biophysical model for nectar intake in hummingbirds. Our findings have ramifications for the study of feeding mechanics in other nectarivorous birds, and for the understanding of the evolution of nectarivory in general. We propose a conceptual mechanical explanation for this unique fluid-trapping capacity, with far-reaching practical applications (e.g., biomimetics).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21536916      PMCID: PMC3111265          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1016944108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

1.  Self-cleaning surfaces--virtual realities.

Authors:  Ralf Blossey
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 43.841

2.  Plant hydraulics: the ascent of water.

Authors:  Melvin T Tyree
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A microbead array chemical sensor using capillary-based sample introduction: toward the development of an "electronic tongue".

Authors:  Young-Soo Sohn; Adrian Goodey; Eric V Anslyn; John T McDevitt; Jason B Shear; Dean P Neikirk
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 10.618

4.  Capillary origami: spontaneous wrapping of a droplet with an elastic sheet.

Authors:  Charlotte Py; Paul Reverdy; Lionel Doppler; José Bico; Benoît Roman; Charles N Baroud
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  The problem of temporal scale in optimization: three contrasting views of hummingbird visits to flowers.

Authors:  C L Gass; W M Roberts
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Directional water collection on wetted spider silk.

Authors:  Yongmei Zheng; Hao Bai; Zhongbing Huang; Xuelin Tian; Fu-Qiang Nie; Yong Zhao; Jin Zhai; Lei Jiang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Water capture by a desert beetle.

Authors:  A R Parker; C R Lawrence
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Meniscus-climbing insects.

Authors:  David L Hu; John W M Bush
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Locomotion on the water surface: propulsive mechanisms of the fisher spider

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Digestive physiology is a determinant of foraging bout frequency in hummingbirds.

Authors:  J M Diamond; W H Karasov; D Phan; F L Carpenter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Mar 6-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  17 in total

1.  Hummingbird feeding mechanics: comments on the capillarity model.

Authors:  Alejandro Rico-Guevara; Margaret A Rubega
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding.

Authors:  Wonjung Kim; Tristan Gilet; John W M Bush
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hummingbird tongues are elastic micropumps.

Authors:  Alejandro Rico-Guevara; Tai-Hsi Fan; Margaret A Rubega
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Specialized bat tongue is a hemodynamic nectar mop.

Authors:  Cally J Harper; Sharon M Swartz; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Surface tension helps a tongue grab liquid.

Authors:  Steven Vogel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The hummingbird's tongue: a self-assembling capillary syphon.

Authors:  Wonjung Kim; François Peaudecerf; Maude W Baldwin; John W M Bush
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Dogs lap using acceleration-driven open pumping.

Authors:  Sean Gart; John J Socha; Pavlos P Vlachos; Sunghwan Jung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cortex-dependent corrections as the tongue reaches for and misses targets.

Authors:  Tejapratap Bollu; Brendan S Ito; Samuel C Whitehead; Brian Kardon; James Redd; Mei Hong Liu; Jesse H Goldberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 69.504

9.  Energy saving strategies of honeybees in dipping nectar.

Authors:  Jianing Wu; Heng Yang; Shaoze Yan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effective directional self-gathering of drops on spine of cactus with splayed capillary arrays.

Authors:  Chengcheng Liu; Yan Xue; Yuan Chen; Yongmei Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.