Literature DB >> 31964267

The mechanics of nectar offloading in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris and implications for optimal concentrations during nectar foraging.

Jonathan G Pattrick1,2,3, Hamish A Symington2, Walter Federle3, Beverley J Glover2.   

Abstract

Nectar is a common reward provided by plants for pollinators. More concentrated nectar is more rewarding, but also more viscous, and hence more time-consuming to drink. Consequently, theory predicts an optimum concentration for maximizing energy uptake rate, dependent on the mechanics of feeding. For social pollinators such as bumblebees, another important but little-studied aspect of foraging is nectar offloading upon return to the nest. Studying the bumblebee Bombus terrestris, we found that the relationship between viscosity (µ) and volumetric transfer rates (Q) of sucrose solutions differed between drinking and offloading. For drinking, Q ∝ µ-0.180, in good agreement with previous work. Although offloading was quicker than drinking, offloading rate decreased faster with viscosity, with Q ∝ µ-0.502, consistent with constraints imposed by fluid flow through a tube. The difference in mechanics between drinking and offloading nectar leads to a conflict in the optimum concentration for maximizing energy transfer rates. Building a model of foraging energetics, we show that including offloading lowers the maximum rate of energy return to the nest and reduces the concentration which maximizes this rate by around 3%. Using our model, we show that published values of preferred nectar sugar concentrations suggest that bumblebees maximize the overall energy return rather than the instantaneous energy uptake during drinking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  flow rate; honeypots; nectar; offloading; sucrose; viscosity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31964267      PMCID: PMC7014798          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  22 in total

1.  Mechanics of nectar feeding in the orchid bee Euglossa imperialis: pressure, viscosity and flow.

Authors:  Brendan J Borrell
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Scaling of nectar foraging in orchid bees.

Authors:  Brendan J Borrell
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  The interaction of temperature and sucrose concentration on foraging preferences in bumblebees.

Authors:  Heather M Whitney; Adrian Dyer; Lars Chittka; Sean A Rands; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-06-04

4.  Maternal mouth-to-mouth feeding behaviour in flower-visiting bats, but no experimental evidence for transmitted dietary preferences.

Authors:  Andreas Rose; Saskia Wöhl; Jan Bechler; Marco Tschapka; Mirjam Knörnschild
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Distasteful Nectar Deters Floral Robbery.

Authors:  Sarah E Barlow; Geraldine A Wright; Carolyn Ma; Marta Barberis; Iain W Farrell; Emily C Marr; Alice Brankin; Bruce M Pavlik; Philip C Stevenson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Optimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars -dependence on sugar intake efficiency and foraging costs.

Authors:  Amy J Heyneman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Effects of nectar concentration and flower depth on flower handling efficiency of bumble bees.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Nectar selection by Melipona and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the ecology of nectar intake by bee colonies in a tropical forest.

Authors:  David W Roubik; Stephen L Buchmann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Fluid intake rates in ants correlate with their feeding habits.

Authors:  J Paul; F Roces
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.354

10.  The psychophysics of sugar concentration discrimination and contrast evaluation in bumblebees.

Authors:  Vladislav Nachev; James D Thomson; York Winter
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  2 in total

1.  How to approach the study of syndromes in macroevolution and ecology.

Authors:  Miranda A Sinnott-Armstrong; Rocio Deanna; Chelsea Pretz; Sukuan Liu; Jesse C Harris; Amy Dunbar-Wallis; Stacey D Smith; Lucas C Wheeler
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Honey bees save energy in honey processing by dehydrating nectar before returning to the nest.

Authors:  Susan W Nicolson; Hannelie Human; Christian W W Pirk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.