Literature DB >> 30032269

Evolutionary ecology of nectar.

Amy L Parachnowitsch1,2, Jessamyn S Manson3, Nina Sletvold1.   

Abstract

Background: Floral nectar is an important determinant of plant-pollinator interactions and an integral component of pollination syndromes, suggesting it is under pollinator-mediated selection. However, compared to floral display traits, we know little about the evolutionary ecology of nectar. Combining a literature review with a meta-analysis approach, we summarize the evidence for heritable variation in nectar traits and link this variation to pollinator response and plant fitness. We further review associations between nectar traits and floral signals and discuss them in the context of honest signalling and targets of selection. Scope: Although nectar is strongly influenced by environmental factors, heritable variation in nectar production rate has been documented in several populations (mean h2 = 0.31). Almost nothing is known about heritability of other nectar traits, such as sugar and amino acid concentrations. Only a handful of studies have quantified selection on nectar traits, and few find statistically significant selection. Pollinator responses to nectar traits indicate they may drive selection, but studies tying pollinator preferences to plant fitness are lacking. So far, only one study conclusively identified pollinators as selective agents on a nectar trait, and the role of microbes, herbivores, nectar robbers and abiotic factors in nectar evolution is largely hypothetical. Finally, there is a trend for positive correlations among floral cues and nectar traits, indicating honest signalling of rewards. Conclusions: Important progress can be made by studies that quantify current selection on nectar in natural populations, as well as experimental approaches that identify the target traits and selective agents involved. Signal-reward associations suggest that correlational selection may shape evolution of nectar traits, and studies exploring these more complex forms of natural selection are needed. Many questions about nectar evolution remain unanswered, making this a field ripe for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30032269      PMCID: PMC6344224          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  108 in total

1.  Nectar sugar composition of European Caryophylloideae (Caryophyllaceae) in relation to flower length, pollination biology and phylogeny.

Authors:  T Witt; A Jürgens; G Gottsberger
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Leaf herbivory and nutrients increase nectar alkaloids.

Authors:  Lynn S Adler; Michael Wink; Melanie Distl; Amanda J Lentz
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Candida gelsemii sp. nov., a yeast of the Metschnikowiaceae clade isolated from nectar of the poisonous Carolina jessamine.

Authors:  Jessamyn S Manson; Marc-André Lachance; James D Thomson
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 2.271

4.  Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  A J BATEMAN
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1948-12       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Folivory affects composition of nectar, floral odor and modifies pollinator behavior.

Authors:  Maaike Bruinsma; Dani Lucas-Barbosa; Cindy J M ten Broeke; Nicole M van Dam; Teris A van Beek; Marcel Dicke; Joop J A van Loon
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 6.  Pollinator-mediated evolution of floral signals.

Authors:  Florian P Schiestl; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  What Are the Environmental Determinants of Phenotypic Selection? A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies.

Authors:  Christina M Caruso; Ryan A Martin; Nina Sletvold; Michael B Morrissey; Michael J Wade; Kate E Augustine; Stephanie M Carlson; Andrew D C MacColl; Adam M Siepielski; Joel G Kingsolver
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Honeybees and nectar nicotine: deterrence and reduced survival versus potential health benefits.

Authors:  Angela Köhler; Christian W W Pirk; Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.354

9.  Invisible floral larcenies: microbial communities degrade floral nectar of bumble bee-pollinated plants.

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera; Isabel M García; Ricardo Pérez
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Microbial diversity in the floral nectar of Linaria vulgaris along an urbanization gradient.

Authors:  Jacek Bartlewicz; Bart Lievens; Olivier Honnay; Hans Jacquemyn
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.964

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Pollination intensity and paternity in flowering plants.

Authors:  Dorothy A Christopher; Randall J Mitchell; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Comparing the contents, functions and neonicotinoid take-up between floral and extrafloral nectar within a single species (Hemerocallis citrina Baroni).

Authors:  Hong-Xia Zhou; Richard I Milne; Peng Cui; Wen-Jing Gu; Meng-Fang Hu; Xin-Yue Liu; Yue-Qin Song; Jun Cao; Hong-Guang Zha
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Label-based expectations affect incentive contrast effects in bumblebees.

Authors:  Claire T Hemingway; Felicity Muth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.812

4.  Nectar composition in moth-pollinated Platanthera bifolia and P. chlorantha and its importance for reproductive success.

Authors:  Emilia Brzosko; Andrzej Bajguz
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Nitrogen Assimilation Varies Among Clades of Nectar- and Insect-Associated Acinetobacters.

Authors:  Sergio Álvarez-Pérez; Kaoru Tsuji; Marion Donald; Ado Van Assche; Rachel L Vannette; Carlos M Herrera; Hans Jacquemyn; Tadashi Fukami; Bart Lievens
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 6.  Sweet solutions: nectar chemistry and quality.

Authors:  Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

7.  Crop Domestication Alters Floral Reward Chemistry With Potential Consequences for Pollinator Health.

Authors:  Paul A Egan; Lynn S Adler; Rebecca E Irwin; Iain W Farrell; Evan C Palmer-Young; Philip C Stevenson
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Male and female bees show large differences in floral preference.

Authors:  Michael Roswell; Jonathan Dushoff; Rachael Winfree
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What Do Nectarivorous Bats Like? Nectar Composition in Bromeliaceae With Special Emphasis on Bat-Pollinated Species.

Authors:  Thomas Göttlinger; Michael Schwerdtfeger; Kira Tiedge; Gertrud Lohaus
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Differences in Nectar Traits between Ornithophilous and Entomophilous Plants on Mount Cameroon.

Authors:  Štěpán Janeček; Kryštof Chmel; Francis Luma Ewome; Karolína Hrubá; Yannick Klomberg; Ishmeal N Kobe; Raissa Dywou Kouede; Jan E J Mertens; Marcus Mokake Njie; Robert Tropek
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.