Literature DB >> 11763964

Nectar feeding by the hovering hawk moth Macroglossum stellatarum: intake rate as a function of viscosity and concentration of sucrose solutions.

R B Josens1, W M Farina.   

Abstract

Although nectar feeding in insects has long been studied, the knowledge of the effect of nectar energy content on the ingestion dynamics separately from the viscosity of the fluid is very limited. To determine the effects of both factors on the feeding behavior of the hovering hawk moth Macroglossum stellatarum, we developed a method to independently manipulate sucrose concentrations and viscosity. The intake rate was analyzed as a function of sucrose concentration, the concentration at constant viscosity (kept constant by adding tylose, an inert polysaccharide), and of the different viscosities of a 30% weight/weight (w/w) sucrose solution (by adding different amounts of tylose). By increasing the concentration, and thus its viscosity, the solution intake rate (in microl s (-1)) decreased beyond a 20% w/w sucrose solution. For a 30% sucrose solution, the intake rate decreased with increasing viscosity. At constant viscosity, the solution intake rate decreased beyond a 30% w/w sucrose solution. However, if we considered the quantity of sucrose ingested per unit time (sucrose intake rate), the same fitted maximum was attained for both series in which the sucrose concentration changed (33.6% w/w). Results suggest that the gustatory input affects the dynamics of fluid ingestion separately from the viscosity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11763964     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-001-0238-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  14 in total

1.  Suction feeding in orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini).

Authors:  Brendan J Borrell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding.

Authors:  Wonjung Kim; Tristan Gilet; John W M Bush
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nectar intake rate is modulated by changes in sucking pump activity according to colony starvation in carpenter ants.

Authors:  Agustina Falibene; Roxana Josens
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Adaptation for rodent pollination in Leucospermum arenarium (Proteaceae) despite rapid pollen loss during grooming.

Authors:  Christopher Michael Johnson; Anton Pauw
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Honeybees prefer warmer nectar and less viscous nectar, regardless of sugar concentration.

Authors:  Susan W Nicolson; Leo de Veer; Angela Köhler; Christian W W Pirk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Feeding mechanisms of adult Lepidoptera: structure, function, and evolution of the mouthparts.

Authors:  Harald W Krenn
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 19.686

7.  Sugar preferences and feeding strategies in the hawkmoth Macroglossum stellatarum.

Authors:  A Kelber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  The effect of ambient humidity on the foraging behavior of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta.

Authors:  Heidy L Contreras; Joaquin Goyret; Martin von Arx; Clayton T Pierce; Judith L Bronstein; Robert A Raguso; Goggy Davidowitz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  The psychophysics of sugar concentration discrimination and contrast evaluation in bumblebees.

Authors:  Vladislav Nachev; James D Thomson; York Winter
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Sucking or lapping: facultative feeding mechanisms in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Jiangkun Wei; Zixin Huo; Stanislav N Gorb; Alejandro Rico-Guevara; Zhigang Wu; Jianing Wu
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.