Literature DB >> 32780979

Sucking or lapping: facultative feeding mechanisms in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Jiangkun Wei1, Zixin Huo1, Stanislav N Gorb2, Alejandro Rico-Guevara3,4, Zhigang Wu1, Jianing Wu1.   

Abstract

Nectarivorous insects generally adopt suction or lapping to extract nectar from flowers and it is believed that each species exhibits one specific feeding pattern. In recent literature, large groups of nectarivores are classified as either 'suction feeders', imbibing nectar through their proboscis, or 'lappers', using viscous dipping. Honeybees (Apis mellifera) are the well-known lappers by virtue of their hairy tongues. Surprisingly, we found that honeybees also employ active suction when feeding on nectar with low viscosity, defying their classification as lappers. Further experiments showed that suction yielded higher uptake rates when ingesting low-concentration nectar, while lapping resulted in faster uptake when ingesting nectar with higher sugar content. We found that the optimal concentration of suction mode in honeybees coincided with the one calculated for other typical suction feeders. Moreover, we found behavioural flexibility in the drinking mode: a bee is able to switch between lapping and suction when offered different nectar concentrations. Such volitional switching in bees can enhance their feeding capabilities, allowing them to efficiently exploit the variety of concentrations presented in floral nectars, enhancing their adaptability to a wide range of energy sources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apis mellifera; feeding strategy; lapping; nectar intake; suction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32780979      PMCID: PMC7480147          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  18 in total

1.  Suction feeding in orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini).

Authors:  Brendan J Borrell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Optimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars -dependence on sugar intake efficiency and foraging costs.

Authors:  Amy J Heyneman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Nectar selection by Melipona and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the ecology of nectar intake by bee colonies in a tropical forest.

Authors:  David W Roubik; Stephen L Buchmann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Effects of nectar concentration on butterfly feeding: measured feeding rates for Thymelicus lineola (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) and a general feeding model for adult Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Kenneth A Pivnick; Jeremy N McNeil
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Nectar uptake rates and optimal nectar concentrations of two butterfly species.

Authors:  P G May
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  How dogs lap: ingestion and intraoral transport in Canis familiaris.

Authors:  A W Crompton; Catherine Musinsky
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Major quantitative trait loci affecting honey bee foraging behavior.

Authors:  G J Hunt; R E Page; M K Fondrk; C J Dullum
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Erection pattern and section-wise wettability of honeybee glossal hairs in nectar feeding.

Authors:  Jianing Wu; Rengao Zhu; Shaoze Yan; Yunqiang Yang
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Nectar uptake in bats using a pumping-tongue mechanism.

Authors:  Marco Tschapka; Tania P Gonzalez-Terrazas; Mirjam Knörnschild
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Quality versus quantity: Foraging decisions in the honeybee (Apis mellifera scutellata) feeding on wildflower nectar and fruit juice.

Authors:  Kyle Shackleton; Nicholas J Balfour; Hasan Al Toufailia; Roberto Gaioski; Marcela de Matos Barbosa; Carina A de S Silva; José M S Bento; Denise A Alves; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cortex-dependent corrections as the tongue reaches for and misses targets.

Authors:  Tejapratap Bollu; Brendan S Ito; Samuel C Whitehead; Brian Kardon; James Redd; Mei Hong Liu; Jesse H Goldberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 69.504

Review 2.  Sweet solutions: nectar chemistry and quality.

Authors:  Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.