Literature DB >> 21940911

Association between type of health insurance and elective cesarean deliveries: New Jersey, 2004-2007.

Marco D Huesch1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: I examined the relationship between insurance coverage, which may influence physician incentives and maternal choices, and cesarean delivery before labor.
METHODS: I analyzed hospital discharge data for mothers without previous cesarean deliveries in New Jersey between 2004 and 2007, with adjustment for maternal age, race, marital status, and maternal, fetal, and placental conditions.
RESULTS: Nearly 1 in 7 women (13.9%) had a cesarean delivery without laboring. Insurance status was strongly associated with cesarean birth. Women insured by Medicaid (adjusted relative risk [ARR] = 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.84, 0.91) or self-paying (ARR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.78, 0.85) had a significantly lower likelihood, and women insured by BlueCross (ARR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.03, 1.09) or standard commercial plans (ARR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.02, 1.10) had a significantly higher likelihood of cesarean delivery than did women insured by commercial health maintenance organizations. These associations persisted in subsets restricted to lower-risk women and in qualitative sensitivity analyses for a hypothetical single, binary, unmeasured confounder.
CONCLUSIONS: Insurance status has a small, independent impact on whether a woman without a previous cesarean delivery proceeds to labor or has a cesarean delivery without labor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21940911      PMCID: PMC3222406          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  39 in total

1.  Physician fees and procedure intensity: the case of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  J Gruber; J Kim; D Mayzlin
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean delivery rate.

Authors:  Susan F Meikle; Claudia A Steiner; Jun Zhang; William L Lawrence
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Fay Menacker; Marian Macdorman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

Authors:  J Zhang; K F Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27-29, 2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Rethinking the cesarean rate: how pregnancy complications may affect interhospital comparisons.

Authors:  Lisa M Korst; Jeffrey A Gornbein; Kimberly D Gregory
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.

Authors:  E B Keeler; M Brodie
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  Why pay extra for cesarean-section deliveries?

Authors:  M D Finkler; D D Wirtschafter
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.730

10.  Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?

Authors:  Mona T Lydon-Rochelle; Carolyn Gardella; Vicky Cárdenas; Thomas R Easterling
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.689

View more
  14 in total

1.  Factors associated with increased cesarean risk among African American women: evidence from California, 2010.

Authors:  Marco Huesch; Jason N Doctor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Disparities in cesarean delivery by ethnicity and nativity in New York city.

Authors:  T Janevic; E Loftfield; D A Savitz; E Bradley; J Illuzzi; H Lipkind
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-01

3.  Association of the Affordable Care Act Dependent Coverage Provision With Prenatal Care Use and Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Jamie R Daw; Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Trends in hospital-based childbirth care: the role of health insurance.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Tetyana P Shippee; Olusola Adegoke; Beth A Vemig
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  The impact of voluntary and nonpayment policies in reducing early-term elective deliveries among privately insured and Medicaid enrollees.

Authors:  Lindsay Allen; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 3.734

6.  Private health care coverage and increased risk of obstetric intervention.

Authors:  Jennifer E Lutomski; Michael Murphy; Declan Devane; Sarah Meaney; Richard A Greene
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  Caesarean sections and private insurance: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; Medina Braha; David C Goodman; Bruno R da Costa; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Women's experience of agency and respect in maternity care by type of insurance in California.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Carol Sakala; Candice Belanoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Effect of Clinical Chorioamnionitis on Cesarean Delivery in the United States.

Authors:  Kerry M Bommarito; Gilad A Gross; Denise M Willers; Victoria J Fraser; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Assessing the Factors Affecting Cesarean Section Selection in Iranian Women Using Multilevel Count Models with Excess Zeros.

Authors:  Eghbal Zandkarimi; Abbas Moghimbeigi; Hossein Mahjub
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.