Literature DB >> 8314609

Why pay extra for cesarean-section deliveries?

M D Finkler1, D D Wirtschafter.   

Abstract

Third-party insurers typically pay at least 50% more for cesarean sections than for vaginal deliveries, suggesting that a reduced national cesarean-section rate could save payers more than $1 billion annually. This paper discusses the payment implications of a cost-effectiveness study, based on the experience within one health maintenance organization, in which cesarean-section rates were unrelated either to direct costs or to perinatal outcomes. Given these results, insurers should consider paying a flat fee for obstetric services unless differing risk levels or risk-adjusted outcomes justify different amounts.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8314609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inquiry        ISSN: 0046-9580            Impact factor:   1.730


  5 in total

1.  Declining fertility and the use of cesarean delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Association between type of health insurance and elective cesarean deliveries: New Jersey, 2004-2007.

Authors:  Marco D Huesch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; S A Dobie; L G Hart; R Schneeweiss; D Gould; T R Raine; T J Benedetti; M J Pirani; E B Perrin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Mind the information gap: fertility rate and use of cesarean delivery and tocolytic hospitalizations in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2011-12-12

5.  The impact of hospital revenue on the increase in Caesarean sections in Norway. A panel data analysis of hospitals 1976-2005.

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Lars Monkerud; Terje P Hagen; Rune Sørensen; Anne Eskild; Irene Skau
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.