Literature DB >> 16571712

Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002.

Eugene Declercq1, Fay Menacker, Marian Macdorman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined factors contributing to shifts in primary cesarean rates in the United States between 1991 and 2002.
METHODS: US national birth certificate data were used to assess changes in primary cesarean rates stratified according to maternal age, parity, and race/ethnicity. Trends in the occurrence of medical risk factors or complications of labor or delivery listed on birth certificates and the corresponding primary cesarean rates for such conditions were examined.
RESULTS: More than half (53%) of the recent increase in overall cesarean rates resulted from rising primary cesarean rates. There was a steady decrease in the primary cesarean rate from 1991 to 1996, followed by a rapid increase from 1996 to 2002. In 2002, more than one fourth of first-time mothers delivered their infants via cesarean. Changing primary cesarean rates were not related to general shifts in mothers' medical risk profiles. However, rates for virtually every condition listed on birth certificates shifted in the same pattern as with the overall rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that shifts in primary cesarean rates during the study period were not related to shifts in maternal risk profiles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16571712      PMCID: PMC1470600          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.052381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  27 in total

1.  The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates.

Authors:  L Dubay; R Kaestner; T Waidmann
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower threshold.

Authors:  C R Leitch; J J Walker
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-06

3.  The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate.

Authors:  B P Sachs; C Kobelin; M A Castro; F Frigoletto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-01-07       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Are we underestimating rates of vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth? The validity of delivery methods from birth certificates.

Authors:  D C Green; J M Moore; M M Adams; C J Berg; L S Wilcox; B J McCarthy
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; John C Hauth; Kenneth J Leveno; Catherine Y Spong; Sharon Leindecker; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Baha Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Factors influencing primary cesarean rates.

Authors:  S M Taffel; S C Clarke; P J Placek
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994.

Authors:  K D Gregory; S C Curtin; S M Taffel; F C Notzon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Effect of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates.

Authors:  K M Parrish; V L Holt; T R Easterling; F A Connell; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Contribution of excess weight gain during pregnancy and macrosomia to the cesarean delivery rate, 1990-2000.

Authors:  Julia C Rhodes; Kenneth C Schoendorf; Jennifer D Parker
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Births: final data for 2002.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Paul D Sutton; Stephanie J Ventura; Fay Menacker; Martha L Munson
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2003-12-17
View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Elective cesarean section: its impact on neonatal respiratory outcome.

Authors:  Ashwin Ramachandrappa; Lucky Jain
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

2.  Delivery indications at late-preterm gestations and infant mortality rates in the United States.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy; Chia-Wen Ko; Tonse N K Raju; Marian Willinger
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Patient-Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population-Based Survey of U.S. Women.

Authors:  Judy Jou; Katy B Kozhimannil; Pamela Jo Johnson; Carol Sakala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Potential Medicaid cost savings from maternity care based at a freestanding birth center.

Authors:  Embry Howell; Ashley Palmer; Sarah Benatar; Bowen Garrett
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2014-09-09

5.  Association between type of health insurance and elective cesarean deliveries: New Jersey, 2004-2007.

Authors:  Marco D Huesch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Prepregnancy Obesity and Primary Cesareans among Otherwise Low-Risk Mothers in 38 U.S. States in 2012.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Marian MacDorman; Michelle Osterman; Candice Belanoff; Ronald Iverson
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.689

7.  Exposure analysis methods impact associations between maternal physical activity and cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Marit L Bovbjerg; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Kelly R Evenson; William Goodnight
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2014-02-05

8.  Midwifery care at a freestanding birth center: a safe and effective alternative to conventional maternity care.

Authors:  Sarah Benatar; A Bowen Garrett; Embry Howell; Ashley Palmer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The association between increased use of labor induction and reduced rate of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Peter Cronholm; Lisa C Kellar; Morghan H Stenson; George A Macones
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Preventing preterm births: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index.

Authors:  Hannah H Chang; Jim Larson; Hannah Blencowe; Catherine Y Spong; Christopher P Howson; Sarah Cairns-Smith; Eve M Lackritz; Shoo K Lee; Elizabeth Mason; Andrew C Serazin; Salimah Walani; Joe Leigh Simpson; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.