Literature DB >> 15802401

A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean delivery rate.

Susan F Meikle1, Claudia A Steiner, Jun Zhang, William L Lawrence.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We describe national trends for elective primary cesarean delivery from 1994 to 2001, with attention to changes in indications.
METHODS: We used data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Cesarean deliveries were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure and diagnostic codes; V codes identified all types of deliveries for denominators. Twelve indications for elective primary cesarean delivery were targeted. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification coding changes were also evaluated.
RESULTS: After excluding women who had labored and previous cesarean deliveries, elective primary cesarean deliveries rose from 19.7% of all cesarean deliveries in 1994 to 28.3% in 2001, an increase of approximately 43.6%. The use of the identified indications for elective primary cesarean delivery increased for codes representing malpresentation, antepartum bleeding, hypertension and severe hypertension, macrosomia, unengaged head, preterm gestation, and maternal soft tissue disorders. Coding for herpes, multiple gestation, other uterine scar, and congenital central nervous system remained the same. Additionally, a new 1998 code for fetal heart rate abnormalities was rapidly adopted during the study period.
CONCLUSION: A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean delivery rate shows a rising trend. Additionally, coded indications for these procedures are shifting. Further examination into the use and clinical implications of indications through national surveillance for elective primary cesarean delivery is important for future obstetric practice. A revision of the terminology classification used to identify indications for cesarean delivery procedures would aid in this effort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15802401     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000157435.67138.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  32 in total

1.  Declining fertility and the use of cesarean delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Robert M Liston; K S Joseph; Maureen Heaman; Reg Sauve; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Impact of the HealthChoice program on cesarean section and vaginal birth after C-section deliveries: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Arpit Misra
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-06-05

4.  Preventive induction of labor: potential benefits if proved effective.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Primary cesarean deliveries prior to labor in the United States, 1979-2004.

Authors:  Jutta M Joesch; Ginger L Gossman; Koray Tanfer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-07-24

6.  Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery and the role of maternal age: a population-based propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Diane Korb; François Goffinet; Aurélien Seco; Sylvie Chevret; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Association between type of health insurance and elective cesarean deliveries: New Jersey, 2004-2007.

Authors:  Marco D Huesch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Primary and Repeat Cesarean Deliveries: A Population-based Study in the United States, 1979-2010.

Authors:  Cande V Ananth; Alexander M Friedman; Katherine M Keyes; Jessica A Lavery; Ava Hamilton; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Trial of labor after cesarean in the low-risk obstetric population: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  S Stattmiller; M Lavecchia; N Czuzoj-Shulman; A R Spence; H A Abenhaim
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  A national study of the complications of lupus in pregnancy.

Authors:  Megan E B Clowse; Margaret Jamison; Evan Myers; Andra H James
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.