Literature DB >> 29450525

Association of the Affordable Care Act Dependent Coverage Provision With Prenatal Care Use and Birth Outcomes.

Jamie R Daw1, Benjamin D Sommers2,3.   

Abstract

Importance: The effect of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) dependent coverage provision on pregnancy-related health care and health outcomes is unknown. Objective: To determine whether the dependent coverage provision was associated with changes in payment for birth, prenatal care, and birth outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study, using a differences-in-differences analysis of individual-level birth certificate data comparing live births among US women aged 24 to 25 years (exposure group) and women aged 27 to 28 years (control group) before (2009) and after (2011-2013) enactment of the dependent coverage provision. Results were stratified by marital status. Main Exposures: The dependent coverage provision of the ACA, which allowed young adults to stay on their parent's health insurance until age 26 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were payment source for birth, early prenatal care (first visit in first trimester), and adequate prenatal care (a first trimester visit and 80% of expected visits). Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery, premature birth, low birth weight, and infant neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.
Results: The study population included 1 379 005 births among women aged 24-25 years (exposure group; 299 024 in 2009; 1 079 981 in 2011-2013), and 1 551 192 births among women aged 27-28 years (control group; 325 564 in 2009; 1 225 628 in 2011-2013). From 2011-2013, compared with 2009, private insurance payment for births increased in the exposure group (36.9% to 35.9% [difference, -1.0%]) compared with the control group (52.4% to 51.1% [difference, -1.3%]), adjusted difference-in-differences, 1.9 percentage points (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.1). Medicaid payment decreased in the exposure group (51.6% to 53.6% [difference, 2.0%]) compared with the control group (37.4% to 39.4% [difference, 1.9%]), adjusted difference-in-differences, -1.4 percentage points (95% CI, -1.7 to -1.2). Self-payment for births decreased in the exposure group (5.2% to 4.3% [difference, -0.9%]) compared with the control group (4.9% to 4.3% [difference, -0.5%]), adjusted difference-in-differences, -0.3 percentage points (95% CI, -0.4 to -0.1). Early prenatal care increased from 70% to 71.6% (difference, 1.6%) in the exposure group and from 75.7% to 76.8% (difference, 0.6%) in the control group (adjusted difference-in-differences, 0.6 percentage points [95% CI, 0.3 to 0.8]). Adequate prenatal care increased from 73.5% to 74.8% (difference, 1.3%) in the exposure group and from 77.5% to 78.8% (difference, 1.3%) in the control group (adjusted difference-in-differences, 0.4 percentage points [95% CI, 0.2 to 0.6]). Preterm birth decreased from 9.4% to 9.1% in the exposure group (difference, -0.3%) and from 9.1% to 8.9% in the control group (difference, -0.2%) (adjusted difference-in-differences, -0.2 percentage points (95% CI, -0.3 to -0.03). Overall, there were no significant changes in low birth weight, NICU admission, or cesarean delivery. In stratified analyses, changes in payment for birth, prenatal care, and preterm birth were concentrated among unmarried women. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of nearly 3 million births among women aged 24 to 25 years vs those aged 27 to 28 years, the Affordable Care Act dependent coverage provision was associated with increased private insurance payment for birth, increased use of prenatal care, and modest reduction in preterm births, but was not associated with changes in cesarean delivery rates, low birth weight, or NICU admission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29450525      PMCID: PMC5838787          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.0030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  34 in total

1.  Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Changes in Self-reported Insurance Coverage, Access to Care, and Health Under the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Benjamin D Sommers; Munira Z Gunja; Kenneth Finegold; Thomas Musco
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Prenatal care initiation among very low-income women in the aftermath of welfare reform: does pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage make a difference?

Authors:  Deborah Rosenberg; Arden Handler; Kristin M Rankin; Meagan Zimbeck; E Kathleen Adams
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-06-09

4.  Preventing Low Birthweight: 25 years, prenatal risk, and the failure to reinvent prenatal care.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Health Insurance Coverage and Health - What the Recent Evidence Tells Us.

Authors:  Benjamin D Sommers; Atul A Gawande; Katherine Baicker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Changes in health and medical spending among young adults under health reform.

Authors:  Kao-Ping Chua; Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Health Insurance Effects on Preventive Care and Health: A Methodologic Review.

Authors:  Jacob Wallace; Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Early Coverage, Access, Utilization, and Health Effects Associated With the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansions: A Quasi-experimental Study.

Authors:  Laura R Wherry; Sarah Miller
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Dependent coverage and use of preventive care under the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Xuesong Han; K Robin Yabroff; Anthony S Robbins; Zhiyuan Zheng; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

1.  Medicaid expansion and infant mortality, revisited: A difference-in-differences analysis.

Authors:  Alexandra Wiggins; Ibraheem M Karaye; Jennifer A Horney
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Effects of ACA Expansion of Dependent Coverage on Hospital-Based Care of Young Adults With Early Psychosis.

Authors:  Susan H Busch; Ezra Golberstein; Howard H Goldman; Christine Loveridge; Robert E Drake; Ellen Meara
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Comparison of Insurance Status and Diagnosis Stage Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer Before vs After Implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Xuesong Han; K Robin Yabroff; Elizabeth Ward; Otis W Brawley; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Insurance Differences in Preventive Care Use and Adverse Birth Outcomes Among Pregnant Women in a Medicaid Nonexpansion State: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yhenneko J Taylor; Tsai-Ling Liu; Elizabeth A Howell
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  The Affordable Care Act and Access to Care for Reproductive-Aged and Pregnant Women in the United States, 2010-2016.

Authors:  Jamie R Daw; Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Medicaid and moms: the potential impact of extending medicaid coverage to mothers for 1 year after delivery.

Authors:  Shetal Shah; Hayley Friedman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Medications for opioid use disorder among pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies before and after Medicaid expansion: A retrospective study of admissions to treatment centers in the United States.

Authors:  Tyler N A Winkelman; Becky R Ford; Rebecca J Shlafer; Anna McWilliams; Lindsay K Admon; Stephen W Patrick
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Market Share of US Catholic Hospitals and Associated Geographic Network Access to Reproductive Health Services.

Authors:  Coleman Drake; Marian Jarlenski; Yuehan Zhang; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-01-03

10.  Characterizing Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Among Medicaid Recipients in a Nonexpansion State.

Authors:  Matthew D Moore; Sara E Mazzoni; Martha S Wingate; Janet M Bronstein
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.