Literature DB >> 8413067

Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.

E B Keeler1, M Brodie.   

Abstract

The dramatic rise in cesarean-section (C-section) rates, and their high costs and wide variation, has raised interest in understanding the factors affecting decisions to use this procedure. The economic incentives of physicians, hospitals, payers, and mothers are examined. In the economic framework, physicians must balance their short-term interests against their reputation, which is derived from efficiently providing what mothers want. Providers who encounter higher opportunity costs while attending to mothers in prolonged labor can reduce these costs by operating or by restructuring their practices. The mainly indirect evidence on financial incentives indicates that insured mothers have low marginal financial costs when they undergo C-section. Mothers with private, fee-for-service insurance have higher C-section rates than mothers who are covered by staff-model HMOs, who are uninsured, or who are publicly insured. In conclusion, research and payment reforms to reduce distortions to good practice are proposed.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8413067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  24 in total

1.  Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals.

Authors:  J Librero; S Peiró; S M Calderón
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Rethinking "woman's choice" of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Chia-Nien Liu; Ming-Chin Yang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Declining fertility and the use of cesarean delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

5.  Medicaid coverage and medical interventions during pregnancy.

Authors:  Leo Turcotte; John Robst; Solomon Polachek
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2005-09

6.  Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  W W Cai; J S Marks; C H Chen; Y X Zhuang; L Morris; J R Harris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Low primary cesarean rate and high VBAC rate with good outcomes in an Amish birthing center.

Authors:  James Deline; Lisa Varnes-Epstein; Lee T Dresang; Mark Gideonsen; Laura Lynch; John J Frey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Association between type of health insurance and elective cesarean deliveries: New Jersey, 2004-2007.

Authors:  Marco D Huesch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The effect of physicians' remuneration system on the Caesarean section rate: the Uruguayan case.

Authors:  Patricia Triunfo; Máximo Rossi
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2009-01-16

10.  Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; S A Dobie; L G Hart; R Schneeweiss; D Gould; T R Raine; T J Benedetti; M J Pirani; E B Perrin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.