Literature DB >> 23504133

Disparities in cesarean delivery by ethnicity and nativity in New York city.

T Janevic1, E Loftfield2, D A Savitz3, E Bradley2, J Illuzzi4, H Lipkind4.   

Abstract

Our objective was to examine differences in risk of cesarean delivery among diverse ethnic groups in New York City. Using cross-sectional New York City birth and hospitalization data from 1995 to 2003 (n = 961,381) we estimated risk ratios for ethnic groups relative to non-Hispanic whites and immigrant women relative to US-born women. Adjusting for insurance, pre-pregnancy weight, maternal age, education, parity, birthweight, gestational age, year, medical complications, and pregnancy complications, all ethnic groups except East Asian women were at an increased risk of cesarean delivery, with the highest risk among Hispanic Caribbean women [adjusted risk ratio (aRR) = 1.27, 95 % CI (confidence interval) = 1.24, 1.30] and African American women (aRR = 1.20, 95 % CI = 1.17, 1.23). Among Hispanic groups, immigrant status further increased adjusted risk of cesarean delivery; adjusted risk ratios for foreign-born women compared to US-born women of the same ethnic group were 1.27 for Mexican women (95 % CI = 1.05, 1.53), 1.23 for Hispanic Caribbean women (95 % CI = 1.20, 1.27), and 1.12 for Central/South American women (95 % CI = 1.04, 1.21). Similar patterns were found in subgroup analyses of low-risk women (term delivery and no pregnancy or medical complications) and primiparous women. We found evidence of disparities by ethnicity and nativity in cesarean delivery rates after adjusting for multiple risk factors. Efforts to reduce rates of cesarean delivery should address these disparities. Future research should explore potential explanations including hospital environment, provider bias, and patient preference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23504133     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-013-1261-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  24 in total

1.  Maternal obesity and diabetes as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences among 4 racial/ethnic groups.

Authors:  Terry J Rosenberg; Samantha Garbers; Heather Lipkind; Mary Ann Chiasson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Association of acculturation with cesarean section among Latinas.

Authors:  Amy I Zlot; Debra J Jackson; Carol Korenbrot
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-03

3.  Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Fay Menacker; Marian Macdorman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data.

Authors:  Shagufta Yasmeen; Patrick S Romano; Michael E Schembri; Janet M Keyzer; William M Gilbert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Ethnicity and gestational diabetes in New York City, 1995-2003.

Authors:  D A Savitz; T M Janevic; S M Engel; J S Kaufman; A H Herring
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Neighborhood deprivation and adverse birth outcomes among diverse ethnic groups.

Authors:  T Janevic; C R Stein; D A Savitz; J S Kaufman; S M Mason; A H Herring
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 7.  Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Fay Menacker; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

8.  Racial differences in cesareans: an analysis of U.S. 2001 National Inpatient Sample Data.

Authors:  Azad A Kabir; Gabriella Pridjian; William C Steinmann; Eduardo A Herrera; M Mahmud Khan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Race, age, and cesarean delivery in a military population.

Authors:  D E Irwin; D A Savitz; W A Bowes; K A St André
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor.

Authors:  Donal J Brennan; Michael S Robson; Martina Murphy; Colm O'Herlihy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  19 in total

1.  The influence of detailed maternal ethnicity on cesarean delivery: findings from the U.S. birth certificate in the State of Massachusetts.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Summer S Hawkins; Bruce B Cohen
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Risk Factors for Shoulder Dystocia: the Impact of Mother's Race and Ethnicity.

Authors:  Jennifer Gaudet Hefele; Palmira Santos; Grant Ritter; Neha Varma; Ann Hendrich
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-04-26

3.  Examining Trends in Obstetric Quality Measures for Monitoring Health Care Disparities.

Authors:  Teresa Janevic; Natalia N Egorova; Jennifer Zeitlin; Amy Balbierz; Paul L Hebert; Elizabeth A Howell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Language Preference and Risk of Primary Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kimberly M Schaefer; Anna M Modest; Michele R Hacker; Lucy Chie; Yamicia Connor; Toni Golen; Rose L Molina
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-04-27

5.  Factors associated with increased cesarean risk among African American women: evidence from California, 2010.

Authors:  Marco Huesch; Jason N Doctor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Likelihood of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Ronald E Iverson; Lois McCloskey
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.689

7.  Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Cesarean Birth and Maternal Morbidity in a Low-Risk, Nulliparous Cohort.

Authors:  Michelle P Debbink; Lynda G Ugwu; William A Grobman; Uma M Reddy; Alan T N Tita; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Ronald J Wapner; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; John M Thorp; Suneet P Chauhan; Maged M Costantine; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Sindhu K Srinivas; Geeta K Swamy; Hyagriv N Simhan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Prenatal attitudes toward vaginal delivery and actual delivery mode: Variation by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Laura B Attanasio; Rachel R Hardeman; Katy B Kozhimannil; Kristen H Kjerulff
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.689

9.  Factors influencing women's perceptions of shared decision making during labor and delivery: Results from a large-scale cohort study of first childbirth.

Authors:  Laura B Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil; Kristen H Kjerulff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-01-05

Review 10.  What Are Optimal Cesarean Section Rates in the U.S. and How Do We Get There? A Review of Evidence-Based Recommendations and Interventions.

Authors:  Diana Montoya-Williams; Dominick J Lemas; Lisa Spiryda; Keval Patel; Josef Neu; Tiffany L Carson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.