S Greenland1. 1. Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health 90095-1772, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most discussions of statistical methods focus on accounting for measured confounders and random errors in the data-generating process. In observational epidemiology, however, controllable confounding and random error are sometimes only a fraction of the total error, and are rarely if ever the only important source of uncertainty. Potential biases due to unmeasured confounders, classification errors, and selection bias need to be addressed in any thorough discussion of study results. METHODS: This paper reviews basic methods for examining the sensitivity of study results to biases, with a focus on methods that can be implemented without computer programming. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity analysis is helpful in obtaining a realistic picture of the potential impact of biases.
BACKGROUND: Most discussions of statistical methods focus on accounting for measured confounders and random errors in the data-generating process. In observational epidemiology, however, controllable confounding and random error are sometimes only a fraction of the total error, and are rarely if ever the only important source of uncertainty. Potential biases due to unmeasured confounders, classification errors, and selection bias need to be addressed in any thorough discussion of study results. METHODS: This paper reviews basic methods for examining the sensitivity of study results to biases, with a focus on methods that can be implemented without computer programming. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity analysis is helpful in obtaining a realistic picture of the potential impact of biases.
Authors: Jiu-Chiaun Chen; Jack T Dennerlein; Tung-Sheng Shih; Chiou-Jong Chen; Yawen Cheng; Wushou P Chang; Louise M Ryan; David C Christiani Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Wendy S Post; Matthew Budoff; Lawrence Kingsley; Frank J Palella; Mallory D Witt; Xiuhong Li; Richard T George; Todd T Brown; Lisa P Jacobson Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Ruth H Keogh; Victor Kipnis; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Helmut Küchenhoff; Laurence S Freedman Journal: Stat Med Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 2.373