Literature DB >> 21847725

Estimated pediatric radiation dose during CT.

Keith J Strauss1, Marilyn J Goske.   

Abstract

State-of-the-art CT scanners typically display two dose indices: CT dose index (CTDI(vol) [mGy]) and dose length product (DLP [mGy-cm]) based on one of two standard CTDI phantoms (16- or 32-cm diameter) used in the calculation of CTDI(vol). CTDI(vol) represents the radiation produced by the CT scanner, not the radiation dose to an individual patient. Pediatric radiologists, aware of this discrepancy, have requested a method to estimate the CT patient dose based on the size of the pediatric patient or small adult. This paper describes the method developed by AAPM Task Group 204 to provide a better estimate of CT patient dose. These improved estimates of patient dose provide radiologists with a practical tool to better manage the radiation dose their patients receive. In the future, size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) received by the patient should be included in the patient's electronic medical record to help radiologists better assess risk versus benefit for their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21847725     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-011-2179-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  11 in total

1.  The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality?

Authors:  Thomas L Slovis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  A new look at CT dose measurement: beyond CTDI.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Restructuring CT dosimetry--a realistic strategy for the future Requiem for the pencil chamber.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Where we are since ALARA and the series of articles on CT dose in children and risk of long-term cancers: what has changed?

Authors:  Walter E Berdon; Thomas L Slovis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-09-03

5.  Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children's hospital.

Authors:  Patricia L Kleinman; Keith J Strauss; David Zurakowski; Kevin S Buckley; George A Taylor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003.

Authors:  P C Shrimpton; M C Hillier; M A Lewis; M Dunn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  T B Shope; R M Gagne; G C Johnson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Effective doses to patients undergoing thoracic computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  W Huda; E M Scalzetti; M Roskopf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Image Gently Vendor Summit: working together for better estimates of pediatric radiation dose from CT.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss; Marilyn J Goske; Donald P Frush; Priscilla F Butler; Gregory Morrison
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  The trouble with CTD100.

Authors:  John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  27 in total

1.  CT radiation dose reduction: can we do harm by doing good?

Authors:  Mervyn D Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-04

2.  Inappropriate arm positioning during scout image acquisition resulting in increased radiation dose while performing a chest CT.

Authors:  Frank Kuo; Michael Plaza; Gaurav Saigal
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10

3.  KERMA ratios vs. SSDE: is one better at estimating pediatric CT radiation doses?

Authors:  Keith J Strauss
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-20

Review 4.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Thomas L Slovis; Donald L Miller; Ruth Kleinerman; Choonsik Lee; Preetha Rajaraman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Use of computed tomography (CT) for urolithiasis in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Angela Gupta; Miguel Castellan
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2015-01

6.  Assessments of Coronary Artery Visibility and Radiation Dose in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease on Cardiac 128-slice CT and on Cardiac 64-slice CT.

Authors:  Y Cui; M Huang; J Zheng; J Li; H Liu; C Liang
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  Movement characteristics in young patients and the impact on CBCT image quality.

Authors:  Rubens Spin-Neto; Louise H Matzen; Lars Schropp; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Computed tomography-related radiation exposure in children transferred to a Level I pediatric trauma center.

Authors:  Adam S Brinkman; Kara G Gill; Charles M Leys; Ankush Gosain
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.313

9.  How accurate is size-specific dose estimate in pediatric body CT examinations?

Authors:  Boaz Karmazyn; Huisi Ai; Paul Klahr; Fangqian Ouyang; S Gregory Jennings
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-04-06

10.  Asian consortium on radiation dose of pediatric cardiac CT (ASCI-REDCARD).

Authors:  Peter K T Hui; Hyun Woo Goo; Jing Du; Janice J K Ip; Suzu Kanzaki; Young Jin Kim; Supika Kritsaneepaiboon; Oktavia Lilyasari; Suvipaporn Siripornpitak
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.