Literature DB >> 17500467

The trouble with CTD100.

John M Boone1.   

Abstract

The computed tomography dose index (CTDI100) is typically measured using a 100 mm long pencil ion chamber with cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) dosimetry phantoms. While this metric was useful in the era of single slice CT scanners with collimated slice thicknesses of 10 mm or less, the efficiency of this metric in multi-slice CT scanners with wide (40 mm) collimated x-ray beams is unknown. Monte Carlo simulations were used to assess the efficiency of the CTDI100 parameter for wider beam collimations. The simulations utilized the geometry of a commercially available CT scanner, with modeled polyenergetic x-ray spectra. Dose spread functions (DSFs) were computed along the length of 12.4 mm diam rods placed at several radii in infinitely long 160 mm diam (head) and 320 mm diam (body) PMMA phantoms. The DSFs were used to compute radiation dose profiles for slice thicknesses from 1 to 400 mm. CTDI00 efficiency was defined as the fraction of the dose along a PMMA rod collected in a 100 mm length centered on the CT slice position, divided by the total dose deposited along an infinitely long PMMA rod. For a 10 mm slice thickness, a 120 kVp x-ray spectrum, and the PMMA head phantom, the efficiency of the CTDI00 was 82% and 90% for the center and peripheral holes, respectively. The corresponding efficiency values for the body phantom were 63% and 88%. These values are reduced by only 1% when a 40 mm slice thickness was studied, so the use of CTDI00 for 40 mm wide x-ray beams is no less valid than its use for 10 mm beam widths. However, these data illustrate that the efficiency of the CTDI100 measurement even with 10 mm beam widths is low and, consequently, dose computations which are derived from this metric may not be as accurate as desirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17500467     DOI: 10.1118/1.2713240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  32 in total

1.  Cone beam CT dosimetry: a unified and self-consistent approach including all scan modalities--with or without phantom motion.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

3.  Dosimetric assessment of the exposure of radiotherapy patients due to cone-beam CT procedures.

Authors:  Mariana Baptista; Salvatore Di Maria; Sandra Vieira; Joana Santos; Joana Pereira; Miguel Pereira; Pedro Vaz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Influence of difference in cross-sectional dose profile in a CTDI phantom on X-ray CT dose estimation: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Tomonobu Haba; Shuji Koyama; Yoshihiro Ida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-11-24

5.  Radiation dosimetry for wide-beam CT scanners: recommendations of a working party of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Authors:  D J Platten; I A Castellano; C-L Chapple; S Edyvean; J T M Jansen; B Johnson; M A Lewis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Anniversary paper. Development of x-ray computed tomography: the role of medical physics and AAPM from the 1970s to present.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Jeffrey Siewerdsen; Patrick J La Riviere; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Dose indices: everybody wants a number.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

9.  Dose spread functions in computed tomography: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Neuroradiologic applications with routine C-arm flat panel detector CT: evaluation of patient dose measurements.

Authors:  Y Kyriakou; G Richter; A Dörfler; W A Kalender
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.