Literature DB >> 21828075

Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.

Cinnamon S Bloss1, Burcu F Darst, Eric J Topol, Nicholas J Schork.   

Abstract

Over the past 18 months, there have been notable developments in the direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing arena, in particular with regard to issues surrounding governmental regulation in the USA. While commentaries continue to proliferate on this topic, actual empirical research remains relatively scant. In terms of DTC genomic testing for disease susceptibility, most of the research has centered on uptake, perceptions and attitudes toward testing among health care professionals and consumers. Only a few available studies have examined actual behavioral response among consumers, and we are not aware of any studies that have examined response to DTC genetic testing for ancestry or for drug response. We propose that further research in this area is desperately needed, despite challenges in designing appropriate studies given the rapid pace at which the field is evolving. Ultimately, DTC genomic testing for common markers and conditions is only a precursor to the eventual cost-effectiveness and wide availability of whole genome sequencing of individuals, although it remains unclear whether DTC genomic information will still be attainable. Either way, however, current knowledge needs to be extended and enhanced with respect to the delivery, impact and use of increasingly accurate and comprehensive individualized genomic data.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21828075      PMCID: PMC3179383          DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddr349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  87 in total

1.  Preparing for a consumer-driven genomic age.

Authors:  James P Evans; David C Dale; Cathy Fomous
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Socioeconomic influences on the effects of a genetic testing direct-to-consumer marketing campaign.

Authors:  D J Bowen; J Harris; C M Jorgensen; M F Myers; A Kuniyuki
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.

Authors:  Stuart Hogarth; Gail Javitt; David Melzer
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.929

4.  Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel; Susanne B Haga; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Primary prevention in a high-risk group: smoking habits in adolescents with homozygous alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (ATD).

Authors:  T Thelin; T Sveger; T F McNeil
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.299

6.  Use of whole-genome sequencing to diagnose a cryptic fusion oncogene.

Authors:  John S Welch; Peter Westervelt; Li Ding; David E Larson; Jeffery M Klco; Shashikant Kulkarni; John Wallis; Ken Chen; Jacqueline E Payton; Robert S Fulton; Joelle Veizer; Heather Schmidt; Tammi L Vickery; Sharon Heath; Mark A Watson; Michael H Tomasson; Daniel C Link; Timothy A Graubert; John F DiPersio; Elaine R Mardis; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Genetic risk estimation in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative.

Authors:  Catharine B Stack; Neda Gharani; Erynn S Gordon; Tara Schmidlen; Michael F Christman; Margaret A Keller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Web-based, participant-driven studies yield novel genetic associations for common traits.

Authors:  Nicholas Eriksson; J Michael Macpherson; Joyce Y Tung; Lawrence S Hon; Brian Naughton; Serge Saxonov; Linda Avey; Anne Wojcicki; Itsik Pe'er; Joanna Mountain
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Risks of presymptomatic direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Justin P Annes; Monica A Giovanni; Michael F Murray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  ACMG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  41 in total

1.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing services: what are the medical benefits?

Authors:  Thierry Frebourg
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Neither as harmful as feared by critics nor as empowering as promised by providers: risk information offered direct to consumer by personal genomics companies.

Authors:  Anders Nordgren
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-04-05

3.  2011 Presidential Address: from classroom to courtroom to clinic-closing the gaps in human genetics education.

Authors:  Lynn B Jorde
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A population approach to precision medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Marta L Gwinn; Russell E Glasgow; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Case Report: Direct Access Genetic Testing and A False-Positive Result For Long QT Syndrome.

Authors:  Sarah Predham; Sara Hamilton; Alison M Elliott; William T Gibson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Risks of nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics? What the scientists say.

Authors:  T Hurlimann; V Menuz; J Graham; J Robitaille; M-C Vohl; B Godard
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 5.523

7.  Genetic risk models: Influence of model size on risk estimates and precision.

Authors:  Ying Shan; Gerard Tromp; Helena Kuivaniemi; Diane T Smelser; Shefali S Verma; Marylyn D Ritchie; James R Elmore; David J Carey; Yvette P Conley; Michael B Gorin; Daniel E Weeks
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers.

Authors:  Vasiliki Mavroidopoulou; Ellie Xera; Vasiliki Mollaki
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.

Authors:  Diane R Koeller; Wendy R Uhlmann; Deanna Alexis Carere; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Behavioral and psychosocial responses to genomic testing for colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Rachel Nusbaum; Yasmin Salehizadeh; Gillian W Hooker; Beth N Peshkin; Morgan Butrick; William Tuong; Jeena Mathew; David Goerlitz; Mary B Fishman; Peter G Shields; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.736

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.