Literature DB >> 26318596

Case Report: Direct Access Genetic Testing and A False-Positive Result For Long QT Syndrome.

Sarah Predham1, Sara Hamilton1, Alison M Elliott1,2, William T Gibson3,4.   

Abstract

We report the case of a woman who pursued direct access genetic testing and then presented with concerns regarding a positive test result for Long-QT syndrome. Although the result ultimately proved to be a false positive, this case illustrates that costs associated with follow-up of direct access genetic testing results can be non-trivial for both the patient and for health care systems. Here we raise policy questions regarding the appropriate distribution of these costs. We also discuss the possibility that, when confronted by a direct access genetic test result that reports high risk for one or more actionable diseases, a family physician might feel compelled to act out of a desire to avoid liability, even when information regarding the accuracy and validity of the testing were not easily accessible. This case outlines lessons that can easily be translated into clinical practice, not only by genetic counselors, but also by family physicians, medical specialists and members of the public.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct access genetic testing; False positive; Health economics; Long-QT syndrome; Positive predictive value; Public policy; Secondary findings; Testing accuracy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26318596     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9882-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  23 in total

1.  Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing: what are we talking about?

Authors:  Meredith Weaver; Toni I Pollin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The incidentalome: a threat to genomic medicine.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane; Daniel R Masys; Russ B Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.

Authors:  Stuart Hogarth; Gail Javitt; David Melzer
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.929

Review 5.  Recommendations for the use of genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of inherited cardiac arrhythmias associated with sudden cardiac death: Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position paper.

Authors:  Michael H Gollob; Louis Blier; Ramon Brugada; Jean Champagne; Vijay Chauhan; Sean Connors; Martin Gardner; Martin S Green; Robert Gow; Robert Hamilton; Louise Harris; Jeff S Healey; Kathleen Hodgkinson; Christina Honeywell; Michael Kantoch; Joel Kirsh; Andrew Krahn; Michelle Mullen; Ratika Parkash; Damian Redfearn; Julie Rutberg; Shubhayan Sanatani; Anna Woo
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Health care providers and direct-to-consumer access and advertising of genetic testing in the United States.

Authors:  Melanie F Myers
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 15.266

7.  Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification.

Authors:  Laura M Amendola; Michael O Dorschner; Peggy D Robertson; Joseph S Salama; Ragan Hart; Brian H Shirts; Mitzi L Murray; Mari J Tokita; Carlos J Gallego; Daniel Seung Kim; James T Bennett; David R Crosslin; Jane Ranchalis; Kelly L Jones; Elisabeth A Rosenthal; Ella R Jarvik; Andy Itsara; Emily H Turner; Daniel S Herman; Jennifer Schleit; Amber Burt; Seema M Jamal; Jenica L Abrudan; Andrew D Johnson; Laura K Conlin; Matthew C Dulik; Avni Santani; Danielle R Metterville; Melissa Kelly; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Kristy Lee; Kent D Taylor; Xiuqing Guo; Kristy Crooks; Lesli A Kiedrowski; Leslie J Raffel; Ora Gordon; Kalotina Machini; Robert J Desnick; Leslie G Biesecker; Steven A Lubitz; Surabhi Mulchandani; Greg M Cooper; Steven Joffe; C Sue Richards; Yaoping Yang; Jerome I Rotter; Stephen S Rich; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jonathan S Berg; Nancy B Spinner; James P Evans; Stephanie M Fullerton; Kathleen A Leppig; Robin L Bennett; Thomas Bird; Virginia P Sybert; William M Grady; Holly K Tabor; Jerry H Kim; Michael J Bamshad; Benjamin Wilfond; Arno G Motulsky; C Ronald Scott; Colin C Pritchard; Tom D Walsh; Wylie Burke; Wendy H Raskind; Peter Byers; Fuki M Hisama; Heidi Rehm; Debbie A Nickerson; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Slovenia: availability, ethical dilemmas and legislation.

Authors:  Irena Vrecar; Borut Peterlin; Natasa Teran; Luca Lovrecic
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.313

9.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a comprehensive view.

Authors:  Pascal Su
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2013-09-20

10.  Genetic counseling in direct-to-consumer exome sequencing: a case report.

Authors:  Saskia van den Berg; Yaoqing Shen; Steven J M Jones; William T Gibson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Ancestry Testing and the Practice of Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Brianne E Kirkpatrick; Misha D Rashkin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.537

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.