Literature DB >> 20352309

Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

Julianne M O'Daniel1, Susanne B Haga, Huntington F Willard.   

Abstract

With the expansion of genomic-based clinical applications, it is important to consider the potential impact of this information particularly in terms of how it may be interpreted and applied to personal perceptions of health. As an initial step to exploring this question, we conducted a study to gain insight into potential psychosocial and health motivations for, as well as impact associated with, undergoing testing and disclosure of individual "variomes" (catalogue of genetic variations). To enable the collection of fully informed opinions, 14 participants with advanced training in genetics underwent whole-genome profiling and received individual reports of estimated genomic ancestry, genotype data and reported disease associations. Emotional, cognitive and health behavioral impact was assessed through one-on-one interviews and questionnaires administered pre-testing and 1-week and 3-months post-testing. Notwithstanding the educational and professional bias of our study population, the results identify several areas of research for consideration within additional populations. With the development of new and less costly approaches to genome risk profiling, now available for purchase direct-to-consumers, it is essential that genome science research be conducted in parallel with studies assessing the societal and policy implications of genome information for personal use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20352309     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9297-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  68 in total

1.  Perceptions of cardiovascular risk among patients with hypertension or diabetes.

Authors:  Bernard D Frijling; Claudia M Lobo; Inge M Keus; Kathleen M Jenks; Reinier P Akkermans; Marlies E J L Hulscher; Ad Prins; Johannes C van der Wouden; Richard P T M Grol
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-01

2.  When do we know that we know? Considering the truth of research findings and the craft of qualitative research.

Authors:  John R Cutcliffe; Hugh P McKenna
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.837

3.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Genome studies: genetics by numbers.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Knowledge and attitudes of Canadian consumers and health care professionals regarding nutritional genomics.

Authors:  Karine Morin
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2009-02

6.  Responses to online GSTM1 genetic test results among smokers related to patients with lung cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Suzanne C O'Neill; Della Brown White; Gerold Bepler; Lori Bastian; Isaac M Lipkus; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  An agenda for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Pauline C Ng; Sarah S Murray; Samuel Levy; J Craig Venter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Public interest in genetic testing for susceptibility to heart disease and cancer: a population-based survey in the UK.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle; Martin J Jarvis; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Medical and lay attitudes towards genetic screening and testing in Finland.

Authors:  Hanna Toiviainen; Piia Jallinoja; Arja R Aro; Elina Hemminki
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Should individuals be informed about their salt sensitivity status? First indications of the value of testing for genetic predisposition to low-risk conditions.

Authors:  Chris M R Smerecnik; Ilse Mesters; Hilde van Keulen; Ingrid Scheffers; Esther Beeks; Peter W De Leeuw; Nanne K de Vries; Hein de Vries
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2007
View more
  16 in total

1.  Communication about DTC testing: commentary on a 'family experience of personal genomics'.

Authors:  Anna Middleton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genetic counseling as a tool for type 2 diabetes prevention: a genetic counseling framework for common polygenetic disorders.

Authors:  Jessica L Waxler; Kelsey E O'Brien; Linda M Delahanty; James B Meigs; Jose C Florez; Elyse R Park; Barbara R Pober; Richard W Grant
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Integrating next-generation sequencing into pediatric oncology practice: An assessment of physician confidence and understanding of clinical genomics.

Authors:  Liza-Marie Johnson; Jessica M Valdez; Emily A Quinn; April D Sykes; Rose B McGee; Regina Nuccio; Stacy J Hines-Dowell; Justin N Baker; Chimene Kesserwan; Kim E Nichols; Belinda N Mandrell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Burcu F Darst; Eric J Topol; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  "It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.

Authors:  Erynn S Gordon; Georgia Griffin; Lisa Wawak; Hauchie Pang; Sarah E Gollust; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.

Authors:  S E Gollust; E S Gordon; C Zayac; G Griffin; M F Christman; R E Pyeritz; L Wawak; B A Bernhardt
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Primary care patients' views and decisions about, experience of and reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Katherine Wasson; Tonya Nashay Sanders; Nancy S Hogan; Sara Cherny; Kathy J Helzlsouer
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-07-07

8.  Genomic risk profiling: attitudes and use in personal and clinical care of primary care physicians who offer risk profiling.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Madeline M Carrig; Julianne M O'Daniel; Lori A Orlando; Ley A Killeya-Jones; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Alex Cho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Genomic information as a behavioral health intervention: can it work?

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Lisa Madlensky; Nicholas J Schork; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 10.  Understanding patient and provider perceptions and expectations of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Andrea D Forman; Susan V Montgomery; Kim L Rainey; Mary B Daly
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.