Literature DB >> 21233721

Genetic risk estimation in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative.

Catharine B Stack1, Neda Gharani, Erynn S Gordon, Tara Schmidlen, Michael F Christman, Margaret A Keller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent genome wide-association studies have identified hundreds of single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with common complex diseases. With the momentum of these discoveries comes a need to communicate this information to individuals.
METHODS: The Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative is an observational research study designed to evaluate the utility of personalized genomic information in health care. Participants provide saliva samples for genotyping and complete extensive on-line medical history, family history, and lifestyle questionnaires. Only results for diseases deemed potentially actionable by an independent advisory board are reported.
RESULTS: We present our methodology for developing personalized reports containing risks for both genetic and nongenetic factors. Risk estimates are given as relative risk, derived or reported from representative peer-reviewed publications. Estimates of disease prevalence are also provided. Presenting risk as relative risk allows for consistent reporting across multiple diseases and across genetic and nongenetic factors. Using this approach eliminates the need for assumptions regarding population lifetime risk estimates. Publications used for risk reporting are selected based on the strength of the design and study quality.
CONCLUSION: Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative risk reports demonstrate an approach to communicating risk of complex disease via the web that encompasses risks due to genetic variants along with risks caused by family history and lifestyle factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21233721     DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318201164c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  27 in total

1.  Direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: a case study and practical recommendations for “genomic counseling”.

Authors:  Amy C Sturm; Kandamurugu Manickam
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Utility of genome-wide association study findings: prostate cancer as a translational research paradigm.

Authors:  A R Turner; A K Kader; J Xu
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Denise M Lautenbach; Kurt D Christensen; Jeffrey A Sparks; Robert C Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 8.929

Review 5.  Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Burcu F Darst; Eric J Topol; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Characterizing genetic variants for clinical action.

Authors:  Erin M Ramos; Corina Din-Lovinescu; Jonathan S Berg; Lisa D Brooks; Audrey Duncanson; Michael Dunn; Peter Good; Tim J P Hubbard; Gail P Jarvik; Christopher O'Donnell; Stephen T Sherry; Naomi Aronson; Leslie G Biesecker; Bruce Blumberg; Ned Calonge; Helen M Colhoun; Robert S Epstein; Paul Flicek; Erynn S Gordon; Eric D Green; Robert C Green; Matthew Hurles; Kensaku Kawamoto; William Knaus; David H Ledbetter; Howard P Levy; Elaine Lyon; Donna Maglott; Howard L McLeod; Nazneen Rahman; Gurvaneet Randhawa; Catherine Wicklund; Teri A Manolio; Rex L Chisholm; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.908

7.  Predictors of adverse psychological experiences surrounding genome-wide profiling for disease risk.

Authors:  K M Broady; K E Ormond; E J Topol; N J Schork; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-11-13

8.  Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing.

Authors:  Tara Schmidlen; Amy C Sturm; Shelly Hovick; Laura Scheinfeldt; J Scott Roberts; Lindsey Morr; Joseph McElroy; Amanda E Toland; Michael Christman; Julianne M O'Daniel; Erynn S Gordon; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly E Ormond; Kevin Sweet
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  "It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.

Authors:  Erynn S Gordon; Georgia Griffin; Lisa Wawak; Hauchie Pang; Sarah E Gollust; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  A randomized trial of the clinical utility of genetic testing for obesity: design and implementation considerations.

Authors:  Catharine Wang; Erynn S Gordon; Catharine B Stack; Ching-Ti Liu; Tricia Norkunas; Lisa Wawak; Michael F Christman; Robert C Green; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.