Literature DB >> 26040209

Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers.

Vasiliki Mavroidopoulou1, Ellie Xera1, Vasiliki Mollaki1,2.   

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) is now offered by numerous companies. The present survey aimed to explore awareness, interest, reasons to take and refuse DTCGT, and understanding of results amongst 725 higher education students in Greece. A third of the responders were aware of DTCGT and interest was dependent on cost. More than 60% of the participants would undergo DTCGT to learn more about their health, to warn their children, so that their doctor can monitor their health and change their lifestyle. Nevertheless, they would prefer to consult their doctor first and expressed concerned about their personal data. After receiving results from a hypothetical DTC genetic test predicting higher risk for colon cancer, 59.5% of the responders thought that they could understand the results but 46.1% believed that the results have diagnostic value. In total, 83.6% of the participants would ask their doctor to explain the results and 70.4% would discuss results with their family. In conclusion, the majority of higher education students in Greece appreciate the benefits of genetic testing but with the involvement of their doctor. A physician's participation in the process and informing the public about the true value of genetic testing, are crucial to avoid misinterpretation of DTCGT results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26040209     DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2015.58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1434-5161            Impact factor:   3.172


  16 in total

Review 1.  Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Burcu F Darst; Eric J Topol; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.

Authors:  Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Anita O'Connor; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Direct to consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of position statements, policies and recommendations.

Authors:  H Skirton; L Goldsmith; L Jackson; A O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.

Authors:  S E Gollust; E S Gordon; C Zayac; G Griffin; M F Christman; R E Pyeritz; L Wawak; B A Bernhardt
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Medical and graduate students' attitudes toward personal genomics.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond; Louanne Hudgins; Jennifer M Ladd; David M Magnus; Henry T Greely; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Experiences of early users of direct-to-consumer genomics in Switzerland: an exploratory study.

Authors:  E Vayena; E Gourna; J Streuli; E Hafen; B Prainsack
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Size of the direct-to-consumer genomic testing market.

Authors:  Caroline F Wright; Shelley Gregory-Jones
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Where are you going, where have you been: a recent history of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Martina C Cornel; Heidi C Howard
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-10-08

Review 9.  Reflections on the US FDA's Warning on Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Seon-Hee Yim; Yeun-Jun Chung
Journal:  Genomics Inform       Date:  2014-12-31

10.  State of play in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for lifestyle-related diseases: market, marketing content, user experiences and regulation.

Authors:  Paula Saukko
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.297

View more
  9 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Kelly F J Stewart; Daša Kokole; Anke Wesselius; Annemie M W J Schols; Maurice P Zeegers; Hein de Vries; Liesbeth A D M van Osch
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Direct to consumer genetic testing in Denmark-public knowledge, use, and attitudes.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Gerdes; Line Nicolaisen; Egil Husum; Janne Bayer Andersen; Martin Dræbye Gantzhorn; Laura Roos; Birgitte Rode Diness
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.351

3.  Health Orientation, Knowledge, and Attitudes toward Genetic Testing and Personalized Genomic Services: Preliminary Data from an Italian Sample.

Authors:  Serena Oliveri; Marianna Masiero; Paola Arnaboldi; Ilaria Cutica; Chiara Fioretti; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Preferences for the provision of whole genome sequencing services among young adults.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Kailyn R Elliott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Stages of behavioural change after direct-to-consumer disease risk profiling: study protocol of two integrated controlled pragmatic trials.

Authors:  Kelly F J Stewart; Anke Wesselius; Annemie M W J Schols; Maurice P Zeegers
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Genetic Testing Consumers in Italy: A Preliminary Investigation of the Socio-Demographic Profile, Health-Related Habits, and Decision Purposes.

Authors:  Serena Oliveri; Giulia Marton; Laura Vergani; Ilaria Cutica; Alessandra Gorini; Francesca Spinella; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-10-08

7.  May direct-to-consumer genetic testing have an impact on general practitioners' daily practice? a cross-sectional study of patients' intentions towards this approach.

Authors:  Daniela Cerqui; Daniel Widmer; Christine Cohidon; Regula Cardinaux; Jacques Cornuz; Robin Chenal; Béatrice Desvergne; Idris Guessous
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Citizens' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Educational Needs in the Field of Omics Sciences: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Giovanna Elisa Calabrò; Michele Sassano; Alessia Tognetto; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Knowledge and Attitudes of Medical and Health Science Students in the United Arab Emirates toward Genomic Medicine and Pharmacogenomics: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Azhar T Rahma; Mahanna Elsheik; Iffat Elbarazi; Bassam R Ali; George P Patrinos; Maitha A Kazim; Salma S Alfalasi; Luai A Ahmed; Fatma Al Maskari
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-10-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.