Literature DB >> 23583311

Behavioral and psychosocial responses to genomic testing for colorectal cancer risk.

Kristi D Graves1, Kara-Grace Leventhal, Rachel Nusbaum, Yasmin Salehizadeh, Gillian W Hooker, Beth N Peshkin, Morgan Butrick, William Tuong, Jeena Mathew, David Goerlitz, Mary B Fishman, Peter G Shields, Marc D Schwartz.   

Abstract

We conducted a translational genomic pilot study to evaluate the impact of genomic information related to colorectal cancer (CRC) risk on psychosocial, behavioral and communication outcomes. In 47 primary care participants, 96% opted for testing of three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to CRC risk. Participants averaged 2.5 of 6 possible SNP risk alleles (10% lifetime risk). At 3-months, participants did not report significant increases in cancer worry/distress; over half reported physical activity and dietary changes. SNP risk scores were unrelated to behavior change at 3-months. Many participants (64%) shared their SNP results, including 28% who shared results with a physician. In this pilot, genomic risk education, including discussion of other risk factors, appeared to impact patients' health behaviors, regardless of the level of SNP risk. Future work can compare risk education with and without SNP results to evaluate if SNP information adds value to existing approaches.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior change; Colorectal cancer risk; Genomic education; SNP testing; Translational genomic research

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23583311      PMCID: PMC3729872          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2013.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  40 in total

1.  Refinement of the basis and impact of common 11q23.1 variation to the risk of developing colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alan M Pittman; Emily Webb; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Kimberley Howarth; Maria Chiara Di Bernardo; Peter Broderick; Sarah Spain; Axel Walther; Amy Price; Kate Sullivan; Philip Twiss; Sarah Fielding; Andrew Rowan; Emma Jaeger; Jayaram Vijayakrishnan; Ian Chandler; Steven Penegar; Mobshra Qureshi; Steven Lubbe; Enric Domingo; Zoe Kemp; Ella Barclay; Wendy Wood; Lynn Martin; Maggie Gorman; Huw Thomas; Julian Peto; Timothy Bishop; Richard Gray; Eamonn R Maher; Anneke Lucassen; David Kerr; Gareth R Evans; Tom van Wezel; Hans Morreau; Juul T Wijnen; John L Hopper; Melissa C Southey; Graham G Giles; Gianluca Severi; Sergi Castellví-Bel; Clara Ruiz-Ponte; Angel Carracedo; Antoni Castells; Asta Försti; Kari Hemminki; Pavel Vodicka; Alessio Naccarati; Lara Lipton; Judy W C Ho; K K Cheng; Pak C Sham; J Luk; Jose A G Agúndez; Jose M Ladero; Miguel de la Hoya; Trinidad Caldés; Iina Niittymäki; Sari Tuupanen; Auli Karhu; Lauri A Aaltonen; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Ian P M Tomlinson; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  "It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.

Authors:  Erynn S Gordon; Georgia Griffin; Lisa Wawak; Hauchie Pang; Sarah E Gollust; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire.

Authors:  David Cella; Chanita Hughes; Amy Peterman; Chih-Hung Chang; Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz; Lari Wenzel; Amy Lemke; Alfred C Marcus; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 4.  Using Alzheimer's disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: implications for personal genomics.

Authors:  J S Roberts; K D Christensen; R C Green
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Assessing perceptions of cancer risk: does mode of assessment or numeracy matter?

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Kristi D Graves; Felicity W K Harper; John E Schmidt; Stephanie L Dickinson; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2007

Review 6.  Lifestyle factors and colorectal cancer risk (1): systematic review and meta-analysis of associations with body mass index.

Authors:  D J Harriss; G Atkinson; K George; N Tim Cable; T Reilly; N Haboubi; M Zwahlen; M Egger; A G Renehan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  A role for common genomic variants in the assessment of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Sawyer; Gillian Mitchell; Joanne McKinley; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Jonathan Beesley; Xiao Qing Chen; David Bowtell; Alison H Trainer; Marion Harris; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Paul A James
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Common genetic variants at the CRAC1 (HMPS) locus on chromosome 15q13.3 influence colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Emma Jaeger; Emily Webb; Kimberley Howarth; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Andrew Rowan; Peter Broderick; Axel Walther; Sarah Spain; Alan Pittman; Zoe Kemp; Kate Sullivan; Karl Heinimann; Steven Lubbe; Enric Domingo; Ella Barclay; Lynn Martin; Maggie Gorman; Ian Chandler; Jayaram Vijayakrishnan; Wendy Wood; Elli Papaemmanuil; Steven Penegar; Mobshra Qureshi; Susan Farrington; Albert Tenesa; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; David Kerr; Richard Gray; Julian Peto; Malcolm Dunlop; Harry Campbell; Huw Thomas; Richard Houlston; Ian Tomlinson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-12-16       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Patients' understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride; Christopher Wade; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert Reid; Eric Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Combining information from common type 2 diabetes risk polymorphisms improves disease prediction.

Authors:  Michael N Weedon; Mark I McCarthy; Graham Hitman; Mark Walker; Christopher J Groves; Eleftheria Zeggini; N William Rayner; Beverley Shields; Katharine R Owen; Andrew T Hattersley; Timothy M Frayling
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Genetic architecture of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ulrike Peters; Stephanie Bien; Niha Zubair
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Discussing race-related limitations of genomic testing for colon cancer risk: implications for education and counseling.

Authors:  Morgan N Butrick; Lauren Vanhusen; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Gillian W Hooker; Rachel Nusbaum; Beth N Peshkin; Yasmin Salehizadeh; Jessica Pavlick; Marc D Schwartz; Kristi D Graves
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Diagnostic exome sequencing in children: A survey of parental understanding, experience and psychological impact.

Authors:  J Wynn; R Ottman; J Duong; A L Wilson; P Ahimaz; J Martinez; R Rabin; E Rosen; R Webster; C Au; M T Cho; C Egan; E Guzman; M Primiano; J E Shaw; R Sisson; R L Klitzman; P S Appelbaum; U Lichter-Konecki; K Anyane-Yeboa; A Iglesias; W K Chung
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 4.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Development and Evaluation of a Telephone Communication Protocol for the Delivery of Personalized Melanoma Genomic Risk to the General Population.

Authors:  Georgina L Fenton; Amelia K Smit; Lucinda Freeman; Caro Badcock; Kate Dunlop; Phyllis N Butow; Judy Kirk; Anne E Cust
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Psychosocial and behavioral outcomes of genomic testing in cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tatiane Yanes; Amanda M Willis; Bettina Meiser; Katherine M Tucker; Megan Best
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Returning Individual Genetic Research Results to Research Participants: Uptake and Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Kara N Maxwell; Laura DiGiovanni; Jamie Brower; Dominique Fetzer; Jill Bennett Gaieski; Amanda Brandt; Danielle McKenna; Jessica Long; Jacquelyn Powers; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-04-16

8.  Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Pamela S Sinicrope; Mary Jane Esplen; Susan K Peterson; Christi A Patten; Jan Lowery; Frank A Sinicrope; Sandra K Nigon; Joyce Borgen; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Louise A Keogh; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Cigarette smoking in women after BRCA1/2 genetic test disclosure: a 5-year follow-up study of the GENEPSO PS cohort.

Authors:  Claire Julian-Reynier; Noémie Resseguier; Anne-Deborah Bouhnik; François Eisinger; Christine Lasset; Emmanuelle Fourme; Catherine Noguès
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Public preferences for communicating personal genomic risk information: a focus group study.

Authors:  Amelia K Smit; Louise A Keogh; Jolyn Hersch; Ainsley J Newson; Phyllis Butow; Gabrielle Williams; Anne E Cust
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.