Literature DB >> 19641293

Socioeconomic influences on the effects of a genetic testing direct-to-consumer marketing campaign.

D J Bowen1, J Harris, C M Jorgensen, M F Myers, A Kuniyuki.   

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests is beginning to appear in select markets, and little independent evaluation has been conducted on the effects of this marketing on consumer attitudes or behavior. The purpose of this paper is to identify the effects of socioeconomic status on women's reactions to such a campaign, including knowledge of the test, perceptions of personal risk, communications with others about the test, and interest in pursuing the test. The only United States provider of genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility (BRCA1/2 testing) conducted a pilot marketing campaign that targeted women aged 25-54 and their health care providers in 2 cities, Atlanta, Ga., and Denver, Colo. The design for the evaluation was a post campaign consumer survey, based on a cross-sectional stratified random sample of women in the 2 intervention sites and 2 comparison sites. The campaign had no differential impact by socioeconomic status. However, there was a consistent relationship between socioeconomic status and several outcome variables, including knowledge of the test, beliefs about the test, and desire to know about genetic risk. These data indicate that socioeconomic status may play a role in uptake of genetic services, regardless of response to a media campaign. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19641293     DOI: 10.1159/000231722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  7 in total

Review 1.  Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Burcu F Darst; Eric J Topol; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  "I Don't Want to Be an Ostrich": Managing Mothers' Uncertainty during BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Carla L Fisher; Thomas Roccotagliata; Camella J Rising; David W Kissane; Emily A Glogowski; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Direct-to-Consumer Genetic and Genomic Testing: Preparing Nurse Practitioners for Genomic Healthcare.

Authors:  Jennifer T Loud
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 0.767

4.  Awareness and preferences regarding BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing among Latinas and non-Latina white women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Amanda Dawn Gammon; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Simmons; Jan T Lowery; Lori Ballinger; Deirdre A Hill; Kenneth M Boucher; Anita Yeomans Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Health care providers and direct-to-consumer access and advertising of genetic testing in the United States.

Authors:  Melanie F Myers
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 15.266

6.  Attitudes and interest in incorporating BRCA1/2 cancer susceptibility testing into reproductive carrier screening for Ashkenazi Jewish men and women.

Authors:  Melanie W Hardy; Beth N Peshkin; Esther Rose; Mary Kathleen Ladd; Savannah Binion; Mara Tynan; Colleen M McBride; Karen A Grinzaid; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-04-29

7.  A qualitative study on Singaporean women's views towards breast cancer screening and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) gene testing to guide personalised screening strategies.

Authors:  Xin Yi Wong; Kok Joon Chong; Janine A van Til; Hwee Lin Wee
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.