Literature DB >> 21811814

Radiation exposure in children during the current era of pediatric cardiac intervention.

Maiy Hamdy El Sayed1, Alaa Mahmoud Roushdy, Hala El Farghaly, Ahmad El Sherbini.   

Abstract

Cardiac catheterizations are among the X-ray procedures with the highest patient radiation dose and therefore are of great concern in pediatric settings. This study aimed to evaluate factors that influence variability of X-ray exposure in children with congenital heart diseases during cardiac catheterization. The study included 107 children who underwent either diagnostic (n = 46) or interventional (n = 61) procedures. A custom-made sheet for patient and procedural characteristics was designed. Data were collected, and different correlations were applied to determine factors that influence variability of X-ray exposure. The fluoroscopy time (FT) differed significantly between the diagnostic (8.9 ± 6.3 min) and intervention (12.8 ± 9.98 min) groups (P = 0.032). The mean dose-area product (DAP) differed significantly between the two groups (3.775 ± 2.5 Gy/cm(2) vs. 13.239 ± 15.4 Gy/cm(2); P = 0.003). The highest DAP was during left anterior oblique (LAO) cranial 30° angulation (2.8 Gy/cm(2)/4 s cine). The mean cumulative dose (CD) was 0.053 Gy in diagnostic cases and 0.48 Gy in intervention cases. The effective dose was 5.97 ± 7.05 mSv for therapeutic procedures compared with 3.42 ± 3.64 mSv for diagnostic procedures. The FT correlated significantly with both the DAP (r = 0.718; P < 0.001) and the CD (r = 0.701; P < 0.001). Other correlations were reported. An increasing number of therapeutic catheterization procedures are being performed for children. The justification for these procedures is evident because they avoid complicated surgery. However, the complexity of these procedures results in higher radiation exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21811814     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-011-0064-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  23 in total

1.  Short communication: Practical aspects for the evaluation of skin doses in interventional cardiology using a new slow film.

Authors:  E Guibelalde; E Vano; L Gonzalez; C Prieto; J M Fernandez; J I Ten
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Reduced radiation during cardiac catheterization of infants using acquisition zoom technology.

Authors:  R D Ross; V Joshi; D J Carravallah; W R Morrow
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Effective doses to patients from paediatric cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  J Rassow; A A Schmaltz; F Hentrich; C Streffer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Patient peak skin doses from cardiac interventional procedures.

Authors:  D Zontar; D Kuhelj; D Skrk; U Zdesar
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Patient dose values in a dedicated Greek cardiac centre.

Authors:  V Tsapaki; S Kottou; E Vano; K Faulkner; J Giannouleas; R Padovani; E Kyrozi; M Koutelou; E Vardalaki; V Neofotistou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures.

Authors:  Koichi Chida; Haruo Saito; Hiroki Otani; Masahiro Kohzuki; Shoki Takahashi; Shogo Yamada; Kunio Shirato; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part I: overall measures of dose.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Stephen Balter; Patricia E Cole; Hollington T Lu; Beth A Schueler; Michael Geisinger; Alejandro Berenstein; Robin Albert; Jeffrey D Georgia; Patrick T Noonan; John F Cardella; James St George; Eric J Russell; Tim W Malisch; Robert L Vogelzang; George L Miller; Jon Anderson
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Patient dose in cardiac radiology.

Authors:  Andreas I Stratis; Prodromos L Anthopoulos; Isidoros P Gavaliatsis; Georghios P Ifantis; Anastasios I Salahas; Ioannis P Antonellis; Antonios G Tavernarakis; Michael I Molfetas
Journal:  Hellenic J Cardiol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

Review 9.  Methods for measuring fluoroscopic skin dose.

Authors:  Stephen Balter
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

Review 10.  The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose.

Authors:  Henri Justino
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09
View more
  11 in total

1.  Radiation Risk Categories in Cardiac Catheterization for Congenital Heart Disease: A Tool to Aid in the Evaluation of Radiation Outcomes.

Authors:  Brian P Quinn; Aimee K Armstrong; Holly D Bauser-Heaton; Ryan Callahan; Howaida G El-Said; Susan R Foerster; Bryan H Goldstein; Andrea S Goodman; Todd M Gudausky; Jacqueline N Kreutzer; Ryan A Leahy; Christopher J Petit; Toby A Rockefeller; Shabana Shahanavaz; Sara M Trucco; Lisa Bergersen
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  The lateral plane delivers higher dose than the frontal plane in biplane cardiac catheterization systems.

Authors:  Osamah Aldoss; Sonali Patel; Kyle Harris; Abhay Divekar
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Patient radiation exposure in a modern, large-volume, pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Andrew C Glatz; Akash Patel; Xiaowei Zhu; Yoav Dori; Brian D Hanna; Matthew J Gillespie; Jonathan J Rome
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Reducing Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure During Endomyocardial Biopsy in Pediatric Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Gossett; Christina L Sammet; Anya Agrawal; Karen Rychlik; David F Wax
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Local reference levels and organ doses from pediatric cardiac interventional procedures.

Authors:  S Barnaoui; J L Rehel; H Baysson; Y Boudjemline; B Girodon; M O Bernier; D Bonnet; B Aubert
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  A comparison of radiation dose between standard and 3D angiography in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  João Luiz Langer Manica; Mônica Scott Borges; Rogério Fachel de Medeiros; Leandro dos Santos Fischer; Gabriel Broetto; Raul Ivo Rossi Filho
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimation in children with heart disease.

Authors:  Jason N Johnson; Christoph P Hornik; Jennifer S Li; Daniel K Benjamin; Terry T Yoshizumi; Robert E Reiman; Donald P Frush; Kevin D Hill
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Substantial radiation reduction in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease interventions with a novel X-ray imaging technology.

Authors:  Nikolaus A Haas; Christoph M Happel; Maria Mauti; Cherif Sahyoun; Lea Z Tebart; Deniz Kececioglu; Kai Thorsten Laser
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2015-01-20

9.  Risk of cancer associated with cardiac catheterization procedures during childhood: a cohort study in France.

Authors:  Helene Baysson; Jean Luc Réhel; Younes Boudjemline; Jerôme Petit; Brigitte Girodon; Bernard Aubert; Dominique Laurier; Damien Bonnet; Marie-Odile Bernier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Evaluation of a new very low dose imaging protocol: feasibility and impact on X-ray dose levels in electrophysiology procedures.

Authors:  Felix Bourier; Tilko Reents; Sonia Ammar-Busch; Alessandra Buiatti; Marc Kottmaier; Verena Semmler; Marta Telishevska; Amir Brkic; Christian Grebmer; Carsten Lennerz; Christof Kolb; Gabriele Hessling; Isabel Deisenhofer
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.