Literature DB >> 25586255

The lateral plane delivers higher dose than the frontal plane in biplane cardiac catheterization systems.

Osamah Aldoss1, Sonali Patel, Kyle Harris, Abhay Divekar.   

Abstract

The objective of the study is to compare radiation dose between the frontal and lateral planes in a biplane cardiac catheterization laboratory. Tube angulation progressively increases patient and operator radiation dose in single-plane cardiac catheterization laboratories. This retrospective study captured biplane radiation dose in a pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory between April 2010 and January 2014. Raw and time-indexed fluoroscopic, cineangiographic and total (fluoroscopic + cineangiographic) air kerma (AK, mGy) and kerma area product (PKA, µGym(2)/Kg) for each plane were compared. Data for 716 patients were analyzed: 408 (56.98 %) were male, the median age was 4.86 years, and the median weight was 17.35 kg. Although median beam-on time (minutes) was 4.2 times greater in the frontal plane, there was no difference in raw median total PKA between the two planes. However, when indexed to beam-on time, the lateral plane had a higher median-indexed fluoroscopic (0.75 vs. 1.70), cineangiographic (16.03 vs. 24.92), and total (1.43 vs. 5.15) PKA (p < 0.0001). The median time-indexed total PKA in the lateral plane is 3.6 times the frontal plane. This is the first report showing that the lateral plane delivers a higher dose than the frontal plane per unit time. Operators should consciously reduce the lateral plane beam-on time and incorporate this practice in radiation reduction protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25586255     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-015-1094-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  17 in total

1.  Patient-specific dose and radiation risk estimation in pediatric cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Klaus Bacher; Evelien Bogaert; Régine Lapere; Daniël De Wolf; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards update: American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on expert consensus documents Society of Thoracic Surgeons Society for Vascular Medicine.

Authors:  Thomas M Bashore; Stephen Balter; Ana Barac; John G Byrne; Jeffrey J Cavendish; Charles E Chambers; James Bernard Hermiller; Scott Kinlay; Joel S Landzberg; Warren K Laskey; Charles R McKay; Julie M Miller; David J Moliterno; John W M Moore; Sandra M Oliver-McNeil; Jeffrey J Popma
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Radiation exposure in children during the current era of pediatric cardiac intervention.

Authors:  Maiy Hamdy El Sayed; Alaa Mahmoud Roushdy; Hala El Farghaly; Ahmad El Sherbini
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Efficacy of a minicourse in radiation-reducing techniques in invasive cardiology: a multicenter field study.

Authors:  Eberhard Kuon; Kerstin Weitmann; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Marcus Dörr; Thorsten Reffelmann; Astrid Hummel; Alexander Riad; Mathias C Busch; Klaus Empen; Stephan B Felix
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 5.  Cumulative radiation dose estimates from medical imaging in paediatric patients with non-oncologic chronic illnesses. A systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Brambilla; Andreana De Mauri; Domenico Lizio; Lucia Leva; Alessandro Carriero; Clara Carpeggiani; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Mandatory radiation safety training for fluoroscopy imaging: a quality improvement priority or unnecessary oversight?

Authors:  Charles E Chambers
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 11.195

7.  Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Shikhar Agarwal; Akhil Parashar; Navkaranbir Singh Bajaj; Imran Khan; Imran Ahmad; Fredrick A Heupler; Matthew Bunte; Dhruv K Modi; E Murat Tuzcu; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 8.  Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Charles E Chambers; Kenneth A Fetterly; Ralf Holzer; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; James C Blankenship; Stephen Balter; Warren K Laskey
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Characterization of radiation exposure and effect of a radiation monitoring policy in a large volume pediatric cardiac catheterization lab.

Authors:  George R Verghese; Doff B McElhinney; Keith J Strauss; Lisa Bergersen
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Estimation of radiation dose and risk to children undergoing cardiac catheterization for the treatment of a congenital heart disease using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Emmanuel Yakoumakis; Helen Kostopoulou; Triantafilia Makri; Anastastios Dimitriadis; Evaggelos Georgiou; Ioannis Tsalafoutas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.