| Literature DB >> 26589627 |
Felix Bourier1, Tilko Reents2, Sonia Ammar-Busch2, Alessandra Buiatti2, Marc Kottmaier2, Verena Semmler2, Marta Telishevska2, Amir Brkic2, Christian Grebmer2, Carsten Lennerz2, Christof Kolb2, Gabriele Hessling2, Isabel Deisenhofer2.
Abstract
AIMS: This study presents and evaluates the impact of a new lowest-dose fluoroscopy protocol (Siemens AG), especially designed for electrophysiology (EP) procedures, on X-ray dose levels. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Catheter ablation; Dose reduction; Fluoroscopy; Imaging; X-ray
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26589627 PMCID: PMC5400031 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Europace ISSN: 1099-5129 Impact factor: 5.214
Detector entrance dose settings for low-dose and lowest-dose protocol
| Detector entrance dose | Low dose (nGy) | Very low dose (nGy) |
|---|---|---|
| Cine-loop acquisition | 120 | 36 |
| Fluoroscopy acquisition | 23 | 8 |
Patient details of both groups
| Patient details ( | Low-dose group | Lowest-dose group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 57.3 ± 15.3 | 58.8 ± 16.2 | 0.57 |
| Female sex (%) | 35% | 32% | 0.71 |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 26.2 ± 2.9 | 25.9 ± 3.6 | 0.58 |
| Body surface area (m²) | 2.01 ± 0.17 | 1.98 ± 0.24 | 0.56 |
| Ejection fraction (%) | 55.2 ± 9.3% | 54.5 ± 10.4% | 0.55 |
| Hypertension, | 74 (53%) | 83 (59%) | 0.28 |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 15 (11%) | 11 (8%) | 0.41 |
| Coronary artery disease, | 17 (12%) | 25 (18%) | 0.18 |
Numbers of treated arrhythmias in both groups
| Treated arrhythmia ( | Low-dose group | Lowest-dose group |
|---|---|---|
| Atrial fibrillation, | 35 | 32 |
| Atypical flutter, | 15 | 18 |
| Typical flutter, | 5 | 3 |
| Accessory pathway, | 3 | 3 |
| AVNRT, | 6 | 8 |
| PVC, | 6 | 6 |
Procedural and clinical data of left atrial procedures
| Complex procedures ( | Low-dose group | Lowest-dose group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure time (min) | 132.6 ± 35.7 | 126.7 ± 34.7 | 0.40 |
| Puncture time (min) | 12.9 ± 5.2 | 11.3 ± 6.7 | 0.18 |
| Mapping time (min) | 11.7 ± 4.3 | 10.6 ± 4.8 | 0.23 |
| RF time (min) | 53.8 ± 26.1 | 50.4 ± 29.4 | 0.54 |
| Complications, | 1 | 1 | 1.0 |
| X-ray time (min) | 10.1 ± 7.6 | 8.6 ± 6.2 | 0.28 |
| Six-month follow-up success (%) | 70% | 72% | 0.82 |
Procedural and clinical data of standard procedures
| Standard procedures ( | Low-dose group | Lowest-dose group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure time (min) | 72.3 ± 20.9 | 85.2 ± 44.1 | 0.24 |
| RF time (min) | 10.1 ± 9.9 | 12.2 ± 14.7 | 0.60 |
| Complications, | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| X-ray time (min) | 7.1 ± 5.4 | 8.7 ± 6.4 | 0.40 |
| Six-month follow-up success (%) | 95% | 95% | 1.0 |
Air kerma values, cine-loop DAPs/frame for different angulations, and DAP per fluoroscopy time
| Parameter | Low-dose group | Lowest-dose group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative AK standard (mGy) | 65.4 ± 75.5 | 15.6 ± 19.8 | <0.01 |
| Cumulative AK complex (mGy) | 110.7 ± 67.6 | 24.6 ± 17.68 | <0.01 |
| Cine-loop DAP (µGym²) | 170.2 ± 179.0 | 50.1 ± 37.8 | <0.01 |
| Cine-loop DAP/frame LAO (µGym²) | 4.5 ± 6.3 | 1.0 ± 0.7 | <0.01 |
| Cine-loop DAP/frame anterior-posterior (µGym²) | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 0.4 ± 0.4 | <0.01 |
| Cine-loop DAP/frame RAO (µGym²) | 2.6 ± 0.8 | 0.74 ± 0.7 | <0.01 |
| Fluoroscopy DAP/s (µGym²/s) | 1.73 ± 1.21 | 0.42 ± 0.24 | <0.01 |