Literature DB >> 24442220

Patient radiation exposure in a modern, large-volume, pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Andrew C Glatz1, Akash Patel, Xiaowei Zhu, Yoav Dori, Brian D Hanna, Matthew J Gillespie, Jonathan J Rome.   

Abstract

Radiation exposure from pediatric cardiac catheterization may be substantial, although published estimates vary. We sought to report patient radiation dose across a range of diagnostic and interventional cases in a modern, high-volume pediatric catheterization laboratory. We retrospectively reviewed diagnostic and interventional cases performed in our pediatric catheterization laboratory from 1 April 2009 to 30 September 2011 for which radiation usage data were available as reported by the Artis Zee(®) (Siemens Medical Solutions) system. Electrophysiology cases were excluded. Radiation dose was quantified as air kerma dose (mGy) and dose-area product (DAP; μGy m(2)). The DAP was converted to an effective dose millisievert (mSv) using the Monte Carlo method. Radiation usage data were available from 2,265 diagnostic and interventional cases with an overall median air kerma dose of 135 mGy [interquartile range (IQR) 59-433], median DAP of 760 μGy m(2) (IQR 281-2,810), of which 75 % (IQR 59-90 %) was derived from fluoroscopy, and median effective dose of 6.2 mSv (IQR 2.7-14.1). Air kerma dose from a single camera >2,000 mGy occurred in 1.8 % of cases. Significant differences in all measures of radiation exposure existed based on procedural and interventional types (p = 0.0001), with interventional cases associated with the highest effective dose after adjusting for patient weight category (p < 0.001). Patient weight, age, fluoroscopy time, and proportional use of digital acquisition were independent predictors of exposure (p ≤ 0.001; R (2) = 0.59-0.64). In a modern, large-volume pediatric catheterization laboratory, the median effective dose is 6.2 mSv with a wide range of exposure based on patient- and procedure-specific factors. Radiation monitoring is an important component of a pediatric laboratory and further dose reduction strategies are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24442220     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-014-0869-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  45 in total

1.  Use of angiographic CT imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Andrew C Glatz; Xiaowei Zhu; Matthew J Gillespie; Brian D Hanna; Jonathan J Rome
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-11

2.  The application of effective dose to medical exposures.

Authors:  Colin J Martin
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Quantification of temporal, procedural, and hardware-related factors influencing radiation exposure during pediatric cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Benjamin G Smith; Shane M Tibby; Shakeel A Qureshi; Eric Rosenthal; Thomas Krasemann
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Charles E Chambers; Kenneth A Fetterly; Ralf Holzer; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; James C Blankenship; Stephen Balter; Warren K Laskey
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks.

Authors:  E Cardis; M Vrijheid; M Blettner; E Gilbert; M Hakama; C Hill; G Howe; J Kaldor; C R Muirhead; M Schubauer-Berigan; T Yoshimura; F Bermann; G Cowper; J Fix; C Hacker; B Heinmiller; M Marshall; I Thierry-Chef; D Utterback; Y-O Ahn; E Amoros; P Ashmore; A Auvinen; J-M Bae; J Bernar; A Biau; E Combalot; P Deboodt; A Diez Sacristan; M Eklöf; H Engels; G Engholm; G Gulis; R R Habib; K Holan; H Hyvonen; A Kerekes; J Kurtinaitis; H Malker; M Martuzzi; A Mastauskas; A Monnet; M Moser; M S Pearce; D B Richardson; F Rodriguez-Artalejo; A Rogel; H Tardy; M Telle-Lamberton; I Turai; M Usel; K Veress
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Effective doses to patients from paediatric cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  J Rassow; A A Schmaltz; F Hentrich; C Streffer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Estimation of radiation dose and risk to children undergoing cardiac catheterization for the treatment of a congenital heart disease using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Emmanuel Yakoumakis; Helen Kostopoulou; Triantafilia Makri; Anastastios Dimitriadis; Evaggelos Georgiou; Ioannis Tsalafoutas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-10-24

9.  Radiation exposure to the pediatric patient during cardiac catheterization and angiocardiography. Emphasis on the thyroid gland.

Authors:  E C Martin; A P Olson; C N Steeg; W J Casarella
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose.

Authors:  Henri Justino
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09
View more
  18 in total

1.  Radiation Risk Categories in Cardiac Catheterization for Congenital Heart Disease: A Tool to Aid in the Evaluation of Radiation Outcomes.

Authors:  Brian P Quinn; Aimee K Armstrong; Holly D Bauser-Heaton; Ryan Callahan; Howaida G El-Said; Susan R Foerster; Bryan H Goldstein; Andrea S Goodman; Todd M Gudausky; Jacqueline N Kreutzer; Ryan A Leahy; Christopher J Petit; Toby A Rockefeller; Shabana Shahanavaz; Sara M Trucco; Lisa Bergersen
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  How Slow Can We Go? 4 Frames Per Second (fps) Versus 7.5 fps Fluoroscopy for Atrial Septal Defects (ASDs) Device Closure.

Authors:  Gurumurthy Hiremath; Jeffery Meadows; Phillip Moore
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Reduction in Radiation Dose in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Lab Using the Philips AlluraClarity X-ray System.

Authors:  Patrick M Sullivan; David Harrison; Sarah Badran; Cheryl M Takao; Frank F Ing
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Measurements of Coronary Artery Aneurysms Due to Kawasaki Disease by Dual-Source Computed Tomography (DSCT).

Authors:  Nobuyuki Tsujii; Etsuko Tsuda; Suzu Kanzaki; Kenichi Kurosaki
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  The lateral plane delivers higher dose than the frontal plane in biplane cardiac catheterization systems.

Authors:  Osamah Aldoss; Sonali Patel; Kyle Harris; Abhay Divekar
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Percutaneous closure of ventricular septal defects in children: key parameters affecting patient radiation exposure.

Authors:  Raymond N Haddad; Chadia Rizk; Zakhia Saliba; Jad Farah
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 7.  Radiation Exposure in Pediatric Interventional Procedures.

Authors:  Agapi Ploussi; Elias Brountzos; Spyridon Rammos; Sotiria Apostolopoulou; Efstathios P Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Cumulative medical radiation exposure throughout staged palliation of single ventricle congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Tacy E Downing; Alicia McDonnell; Xiaowei Zhu; Yoav Dori; Matthew J Gillespie; Jonathan J Rome; Andrew C Glatz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Radiation Exposure by Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography (3DRA) During Trans-catheter Melody Pulmonary Valve Procedures (TMPV) in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.

Authors:  Hoang H Nguyen; David T Balzer; Joshua J Murphy; Ramzi Nicolas; Shabana Shahanavaz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  Radiation Reduction Capabilities of a Next-Generation Pediatric Imaging Platform.

Authors:  Luke J Lamers; Martine Moran; Jenna N Torgeson; John S Hokanson
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.