Literature DB >> 27878626

Reducing Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure During Endomyocardial Biopsy in Pediatric Transplant Recipients.

Jeffrey G Gossett1,2, Christina L Sammet3,4, Anya Agrawal3,4, Karen Rychlik3,4, David F Wax3,4.   

Abstract

Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) with fluoroscopy is used for rejection surveillance in pediatric heart transplantation. Lowering frame rate may reduce radiation, but decreases temporal resolution and image quality. We undertook a quality initiative reducing frame rate from 10 frames per second (FPS) to 5 FPS. To assess whether lowering frame rate can reduce radiation exposure without compromising safety, data on EMBs from 9/2009 to 4/2013 without angiography or intervention were reviewed. Effective dose was calculated from dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time. Complications were reviewed. Independent t test compared pre- and post-data and a general linear model were used to control for confounders. Paired t test of most proximate data was used for pts with EMB before and after our change. Eighty-six patients had 543 EMB. After adjusting for weight, attending, and presence of a fellow, the lower FPS group had a 60.3% reduction in DAP (p < 0.0001) and 53.8% drop in effective dose (p < 0.0001). Fluoroscopy time did not differ. Twenty-eight pts had EMBs both before and after the FPS change. Pair-wise analysis of this group demonstrated a 33% reduction in DAP (p < 0.05) and 37% drop in effective dose (p < 0.01), without difference in fluoroscopy time. No patient had an increase in TR > 1 grade by ECHO. There were no deaths or perforations. Lowering the frame rate reduces radiation exposure by >50% without compromising safety. Efforts to further minimize radiation exposure of this vulnerable population should be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Catheterization; Children; Fluoroscopy; Heart transplant; Radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27878626     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-016-1514-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  32 in total

1.  Radiation exposure after heart transplantation: trends and significance.

Authors:  Mumin Noor; Jane Shekhdar; Nicholas R Banner
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

3.  Radiation exposure and attributed cancer risk following lung transplantation.

Authors:  Dror Rosengarten; Yael Raviv; Victoria Rusanov; Osnat Moreh-Rahav; Oren Fruchter; Aaron M Allen; Mordechai R Kramer
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Endomyocardial biopsy and selective coronary angiography are low-risk procedures in pediatric heart transplant recipients: results of a multicenter experience.

Authors:  Kevin P Daly; Audrey C Marshall; Julie A Vincent; Warren A Zuckerman; Timothy M Hoffman; Charles E Canter; Elizabeth D Blume; Lisa Bergersen
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Radiation reduction in pediatric and adult congenital patients during cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Daniel A Mauriello; Kenneth A Fetterly; Ryan J Lennon; Guy S Reeder; Nathaniel W Taggart; Donald J Hagler; Frank Cetta; Allison K Cabalka
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Cause of death in pediatric and infant heart transplant recipients: review of a 20-year, single-institution cohort.

Authors:  Craig W Zuppan; Linda M Wells; Justin C Kerstetter; Joyce K Johnston; Leonard L Bailey; Richard E Chinnock
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  A 25-year experience of endomyocardial biopsy safety in infants.

Authors:  Derek Zhorne; Christopher J Petit; Frank F Ing; Henri Justino; John L Jefferies; William J Dreyer; Debra Kearney; Matthew A Crystal
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Richard Doll; Dudley T Goodhead; Eric J Hall; Charles E Land; John B Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; R Julian Preston; Jerome S Puskin; Elaine Ron; Rainer K Sachs; Jonathan M Samet; Richard B Setlow; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Role of endomyocardial biopsy in rejection surveillance after heart transplantation in neonates and children.

Authors:  V R Zales; S Crawford; C L Backer; E Pahl; C L Webb; P Lynch; C Mavroudis; D W Benson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose.

Authors:  Henri Justino
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Combined Echo and Fluoroscopy-Guided Pulmonary Valvuloplasty in Neonates and Infants: Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Nicholas K Brown; Nazia Husain; Jennifer Arzu; Sandhya R Ramlogan; Alan W Nugent; Paul Tannous
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 1.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.