Literature DB >> 16498105

Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures.

Koichi Chida1, Haruo Saito, Hiroki Otani, Masahiro Kohzuki, Shoki Takahashi, Shogo Yamada, Kunio Shirato, Masayuki Zuguchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Real-time maximum dose monitoring of the skin is unavailable on many of the X-ray machines that are used for cardiac intervention procedures. Therefore, some reports have recommended that physicians record the fluoroscopic time for patients undergoing fluoroscopically guided intervention procedures. However, the relationship between the fluoroscopic time and the maximum radiation skin dose is not clear. This article describes the correlation between the maximum radiation skin dose and fluoroscopic time for patients undergoing cardiac intervention procedures. In addition, we examined whether the correlations between maximum radiation skin dose and body weight, fluoroscopic time, and dose-area product (DAP) were useful for estimating the maximum skin dose during cardiac intervention procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred consecutive cardiac intervention procedures were studied: 172 percutaneous coronary interventions and 28 cardiac radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) procedures. The patient skin dose and DAP were measured using Caregraph with skin-dose-mapping software.
RESULTS: For the RFCA procedures, we found a good correlation between the maximum radiation skin dose and fluoroscopic time (r = 0.801, p < 0.0001), whereas we found a poor correlation between the maximum radiation skin dose and fluoroscopic time for the percutaneous coronary intervention procedures (r = 0.628, p < 0.0001). There was a strong correlation between the maximum radiation skin dose and DAP in RFCA procedures (r = 0.942, p < 0.0001). There was also a significant correlation between the maximum radiation skin dose and DAP (r = 0.724, p < 0.0001) and weight-fluoroscopic time product (WFP) (r = 0.709, p < 0.0001) in percutaneous coronary intervention procedures.
CONCLUSION: The correlation between the maximum radiation skin dose with DAP is more striking than that with fluoroscopic time in both RFCA and percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. We recommend that physicians record the DAP when it can be monitored and that physicians record the fluoroscopic time when DAP cannot be monitored for estimating the maximum patient skin dose in RFCA procedures. For estimating the maximum patient skin dose in percutaneous coronary intervention procedures, we also recommend that physicians record DAP when it can be monitored and that physicians record WFP when DAP cannot be monitored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16498105     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  41 in total

1.  Main clinical, therapeutic and technical factors related to patient's maximum skin dose in interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  N Journy; S Sinno-Tellier; C Maccia; A Le Tertre; P Pirard; P Pagès; D Eilstein; J Donadieu; O Bar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Fluoroscopy-guided jejunal extension tube placement through existing gastrostomy tubes: analysis of 391 procedures.

Authors:  Andre Uflacker; Yujie Qiao; Genevieve Easley; James Patrie; Drew Lambert; Eduard E de Lange
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  A Rotatable Quality Control Phantom for Evaluating the Performance of Flat Panel Detectors in Imaging Moving Objects.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Haga; Koichi Chida; Yohei Inaba; Yuji Kaga; Taiichiro Meguro; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at a national level.

Authors:  A Aroua; H Rickli; J-C Stauffer; P Schnyder; P R Trueb; J-F Valley; P Vock; F R Verdun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Radiation exposure in children during the current era of pediatric cardiac intervention.

Authors:  Maiy Hamdy El Sayed; Alaa Mahmoud Roushdy; Hala El Farghaly; Ahmad El Sherbini
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Comparison of dose at an interventional reference point between the displayed estimated value and measured value.

Authors:  Koichi Chida; Yohei Inaba; Yoshiaki Morishima; Masaaki Taura; Ayako Ebata; Isao Yanagawa; Ken Takeda; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-06-04

7.  Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure during Percutaneous Kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Hyun-Chul Choi
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-01-31

8.  Three-dimensional tracking of cardiac catheters using an inverse geometry x-ray fluoroscopy system.

Authors:  Michael A Speidel; Michael T Tomkowiak; Amish N Raval; Michael S Van Lysel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Radiation exposure during coronary angiography via transradial or transfemoral approaches when performed by experienced operators.

Authors:  Binita Shah; Sripal Bangalore; Frederick Feit; Gregory Fernandez; John Coppola; Michael J Attubato; James Slater
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Radiation dose and intra-articular access: comparison of the lateral mortise and anterior midline approaches to fluoroscopically guided tibiotalar joint injections.

Authors:  Ambrose J Huang; Rene Balza; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella; Connie Y Chang; Frank J Simeone; William E Palmer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.