Literature DB >> 21774009

7 Tesla (T) human cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using FLASH and SSFP to assess cardiac function: validation against 1.5 T and 3 T.

J J Suttie1, L Delabarre, A Pitcher, P F van de Moortele, S Dass, C J Snyder, J M Francis, G J Metzger, P Weale, K Ugurbil, S Neubauer, M Robson, T Vaughan.   

Abstract

We report the first comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T field strengths using steady state free precession (SSFP) and fast low angle shot (FLASH) cine sequences. Cardiac volumes and mass measurements were assessed for feasibility, reproducibility and validity at each given field strength using FLASH and SSFP sequences. Ten healthy volunteers underwent retrospectively electrocardiogram (ECG) gated CMR at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T using FLASH and SSFP sequences. B1 and B0 shimming and frequency scouts were used to optimise image quality. Cardiac volume and mass measurements were not significantly affected by field strength when using the same imaging sequence (P > 0.05 for all parameters at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T). SSFP imaging returned larger end diastolic and end systolic volumes and smaller left ventricular masses than FLASH imaging at 7 T, and at the lower field strengths (P < 0.05 for each parameter). However, univariate general linear model analysis with fixed effects for sequence and field strengths found an interaction between imaging sequence and field strength (P = 0.03), with a smaller difference in volumes and mass measurements between SSFP and FLASH imaging at 7 T than 1.5 T and 3 T. SSFP and FLASH cine imaging at 7 T is technically feasible and provides valid assessment of cardiac volumes and mass compared with CMR imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T field strengths.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21774009      PMCID: PMC3440016          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  18 in total

1.  Fiber-optic stethoscope: a cardiac monitoring and gating system for magnetic resonance microscopy.

Authors:  Anja C S Brau; Charles T Wheeler; Laurence W Hedlund; G Allan Johnson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in head images.

Authors:  J T Vaughan; M Garwood; C M Collins; W Liu; L DelaBarre; G Adriany; P Andersen; H Merkle; R Goebel; M B Smith; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility.

Authors:  James C C Moon; Christine H Lorenz; Jane M Francis; Gillian C Smith; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Local B1+ shimming for prostate imaging with transceiver arrays at 7T based on subject-dependent transmit phase measurements.

Authors:  Gregory J Metzger; Carl Snyder; Can Akgun; Tommy Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges.

Authors:  Oliver Wieben; Christopher Francois; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.

Authors:  Tobias Frauenrath; Fabian Hezel; Uwe Heinrichs; Sebastian Kozerke; Jane F Utting; Malte Kob; Christoph Butenweg; Peter Boesiger; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Initial results on in vivo human coronary MR angiography at 7 T.

Authors:  Saskia G C van Elderen; Saska G C van Elderen; Maarten J Versluis; Andrew G Webb; Jos J M Westenberg; Joost Doornbos; Nadine B Smith; Albert de Roos; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C H Lorenz; E S Walker; V L Morgan; S S Klein; T P Graham
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Initial results of cardiac imaging at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  C J Snyder; L DelaBarre; G J Metzger; P-F van de Moortele; C Akgun; K Ugurbil; J T Vaughan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  29 in total

1.  Comparison of three multichannel transmit/receive radiofrequency coil configurations for anatomic and functional cardiac MRI at 7.0T: implications for clinical imaging.

Authors:  Lukas Winter; Peter Kellman; Wolfgang Renz; Andreas Gräßl; Fabian Hezel; Christof Thalhammer; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Valeriy Tkachenko; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging at ultrahigh fields.

Authors:  Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  RF pulse methods for use with surface coils: Frequency-modulated pulses and parallel transmission.

Authors:  Michael Garwood; Kamil Uğurbil
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  [Cardiovascular ultrahigh field magnetic resonance imaging : challenges, technical solutions and opportunities].

Authors:  T Niendorf; J Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Simultaneous multislice multiband parallel radiofrequency excitation with independent slice-specific transmit B1 homogenization.

Authors:  Xiaoping Wu; Sebastian Schmitter; Edward J Auerbach; Steen Moeller; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-François Van de Moortele
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Measuring renal tissue relaxation times at 7 T.

Authors:  Xiufeng Li; Patrick J Bolan; Kamil Ugurbil; Gregory J Metzger
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  First in-vivo human imaging at 10.5T: Imaging the body at 447 MHz.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan He; M Arcan Ertürk; Andrea Grant; Xiaoping Wu; Russell L Lagore; Lance DelaBarre; Yiğitcan Eryaman; Gregor Adriany; Eddie J Auerbach; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregory J Metzger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Imaging at ultrahigh magnetic fields: History, challenges, and solutions.

Authors:  Kamil Uğurbil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Two-dimensional sixteen channel transmit/receive coil array for cardiac MRI at 7.0 T: design, evaluation, and application.

Authors:  Christof Thalhammer; Wolfgang Renz; Lukas Winter; Fabian Hezel; Jan Rieger; Harald Pfeiffer; Andreas Graessl; Frank Seifert; Werner Hoffmann; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Valeriy Tkachenko; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Peter Kellman; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Motion-robust cardiac B1+ mapping at 3T using interleaved bloch-siegert shifts.

Authors:  Sebastian Weingärtner; Fabian Zimmer; Gregory J Metzger; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Mehmet Akçakaya
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.