OBJECTIVES: To implement, examine, and compare three multichannel transmit/receive coil configurations for cardiovascular MR (CMR) at 7T. METHODS: Three radiofrequency transmit-receive (TX/RX) coils with 4-, 8-, and 16-coil elements were used. Ten healthy volunteers (seven males, age 28 ± 4 years) underwent CMR at 7T. For all three RX/TX coils, 2D CINE FLASH images of the heart were acquired. Cardiac chamber quantification, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis, parallel imaging performance assessment, and image quality scoring were performed. RESULTS: Mean total examination time was 29 ± 5 min. All images obtained with the 8- and 16-channel coils were diagnostic. No significant difference in ejection fraction (EF) (P > 0.09) or left ventricular mass (LVM) (P > 0.31) was observed between the coils. The 8- and 16-channel arrays yielded a higher mean SNR in the septum versus the 4-channel coil. The lowest geometry factors were found for the 16-channel coil (mean ± SD 2.3 ± 0.5 for R = 4). Image quality was rated significantly higher (P < 0.04) for the 16-channel coil versus the 8- and 4-channel coils. CONCLUSIONS: All three coil configurations are suitable for CMR at 7.0T under routine circumstances. A larger number of coil elements enhances image quality and parallel imaging performance but does not impact the accuracy of cardiac chamber quantification. KEY POINTS : • Cardiac chamber quantification using 7.0T magnetic resonance imaging is feasible. • Examination times for cardiac chamber quantification at 7.0T match current clinical practice. • Multichannel transceiver RF technology facilitates improved image quality and parallel imaging performance. • Increasing the number of RF channels does not influence cardiac chamber quantification.
OBJECTIVES: To implement, examine, and compare three multichannel transmit/receive coil configurations for cardiovascular MR (CMR) at 7T. METHODS: Three radiofrequency transmit-receive (TX/RX) coils with 4-, 8-, and 16-coil elements were used. Ten healthy volunteers (seven males, age 28 ± 4 years) underwent CMR at 7T. For all three RX/TX coils, 2D CINE FLASH images of the heart were acquired. Cardiac chamber quantification, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis, parallel imaging performance assessment, and image quality scoring were performed. RESULTS: Mean total examination time was 29 ± 5 min. All images obtained with the 8- and 16-channel coils were diagnostic. No significant difference in ejection fraction (EF) (P > 0.09) or left ventricular mass (LVM) (P > 0.31) was observed between the coils. The 8- and 16-channel arrays yielded a higher mean SNR in the septum versus the 4-channel coil. The lowest geometry factors were found for the 16-channel coil (mean ± SD 2.3 ± 0.5 for R = 4). Image quality was rated significantly higher (P < 0.04) for the 16-channel coil versus the 8- and 4-channel coils. CONCLUSIONS: All three coil configurations are suitable for CMR at 7.0T under routine circumstances. A larger number of coil elements enhances image quality and parallel imaging performance but does not impact the accuracy of cardiac chamber quantification. KEY POINTS : • Cardiac chamber quantification using 7.0T magnetic resonance imaging is feasible. • Examination times for cardiac chamber quantification at 7.0T match current clinical practice. • Multichannel transceiver RF technology facilitates improved image quality and parallel imaging performance. • Increasing the number of RF channels does not influence cardiac chamber quantification.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Saskia G C van Elderen; Saska G C van Elderen; Maarten J Versluis; Andrew G Webb; Jos J M Westenberg; Joost Doornbos; Nadine B Smith; Albert de Roos; Matthias Stuber Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Anne Brandts; Jos J M Westenberg; Maarten J Versluis; Lucia J M Kroft; Nadine B Smith; Andrew G Webb; Albert de Roos Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: J J Suttie; L Delabarre; A Pitcher; P F van de Moortele; S Dass; C J Snyder; J M Francis; G J Metzger; P Weale; K Ugurbil; S Neubauer; M Robson; T Vaughan Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Andreas Christ; Wolfgang Kainz; Eckhart G Hahn; Katharina Honegger; Marcel Zefferer; Esra Neufeld; Wolfgang Rascher; Rolf Janka; Werner Bautz; Ji Chen; Berthold Kiefer; Peter Schmitt; Hans-Peter Hollenbach; Jianxiang Shen; Michael Oberle; Dominik Szczerba; Anthony Kam; Joshua W Guag; Niels Kuster Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: C J Snyder; L DelaBarre; G J Metzger; P-F van de Moortele; C Akgun; K Ugurbil; J T Vaughan Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: J Thomas Vaughan; Carl J Snyder; Lance J DelaBarre; Patrick J Bolan; Jinfeng Tian; Lizann Bolinger; Gregor Adriany; Peter Andersen; John Strupp; Kamil Ugurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lale Umutlu; Oliver Kraff; Anja Fischer; Sonja Kinner; Stefan Maderwald; Kai Nassenstein; Felix Nensa; Johannes Grüneisen; Stephan Orzada; Andreas K Bitz; Michael Forsting; Mark E Ladd; Thomas C Lauenstein Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-05-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: J M Theysohn; O Kraff; S Orzada; N Theysohn; T Classen; S Landgraeber; M E Ladd; T C Lauenstein Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2013-08-18 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Kamil Uğurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Andrea Grant; Edward J Auerbach; Arcan Ertürk; Russell Lagore; Jutta M Ellermann; Xiaoxuan He; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 2.266
Authors: J M Theysohn; O Kraff; N Theysohn; S Orzada; S Landgraeber; M E Ladd; T C Lauenstein Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: M Arcan Ertürk; Alexander J E Raaijmakers; Gregor Adriany; Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregory J Metzger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sebastian Schmitter; Lance DelaBarre; Xiaoping Wu; Andreas Greiser; Dingxin Wang; Edward J Auerbach; J Thomas Vaughan; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-François Van de Moortele Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 4.668