Literature DB >> 21769569

Primary care physicians' awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Karen P Powell1, Whitney A Cogswell, Carol A Christianson, Gaurav Dave, Amit Verma, Sonja Eubanks, Vincent C Henrich.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess primary care physicians' awareness, experience, opinions and preparedness to answer patients' questions regarding direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. An anonymous survey was mailed to 2,402 family and internal medicine providers in North Carolina. Of the 382 respondents, 38.7% (n = 148) were aware of and 15% (n = 59) felt prepared to answer questions about DTC genetic tests. Respondents aged 50 or older were more likely to be aware of DTC genetic testing than those less than 40 years old (OR = 2.42). Male providers were more likely to feel prepared to answer questions than female providers (OR = 2.65). Among respondents who reportedly were aware, family practitioners were more likely than internists (OR = 3.30) to think DTC testing was clinically useful, and 18.9% had patients ask questions or bring in test results. The small percent of physicians who were aware of DTC genetic testing or felt prepared to answer questions about it suggests that education of providers will be necessary if testing becomes more widespread.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21769569     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9390-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  22 in total

1.  Where there's a web, there's a way: commercial genetic testing and the Internet.

Authors:  Bryn Williams-Jones
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2003

2.  General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far?

Authors:  B R McAvoy; E F Kaner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

3.  Perceived genetic knowledge, attitudes towards genetic testing, and the relationship between these among patients with a chronic disease.

Authors:  Mattijn Morren; Mieke Rijken; Arianne N Baanders; Jozien Bensing
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-08-30

4.  Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Christina M Diaz; Tao Wang; Susan G Hilsenbeck
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Empowering primary care health professionals in medical genetics: how soon? How fast? How far?

Authors:  K Greendale; R E Pyeritz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

Review 6.  Genetic testing in primary care.

Authors:  Wylie Burke
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.929

7.  Health care provider and consumer awareness, perceptions, and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests, United States, 2008.

Authors:  Katherine Kolor; Tiebin Liu; Jeanette St Pierre; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Size of the direct-to-consumer genomic testing market.

Authors:  Caroline F Wright; Shelley Gregory-Jones
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Direct to consumer genetic testing: Avoiding a culture war.

Authors:  James P Evans; Robert C Green
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem.

Authors:  Marieke J H Baars; Lidewij Henneman; Leo P Ten Kate
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  47 in total

1.  An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice.

Authors:  Gemma R Brett; Sylvia A Metcalfe; David J Amor; Jane L Halliday
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  2011 Presidential Address: from classroom to courtroom to clinic-closing the gaps in human genetics education.

Authors:  Lynn B Jorde
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  To ban or not to ban? Clinical geneticists' views on the regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Heidi Carmen Howard; Pascal Borry
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  'Someday it will be the norm': physician perspectives on the utility of genome sequencing for patient care in the MedSeq Project.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; Kurt D Christensen; Melody J Slashinski; Denise M Lautenbach; Sridharan Raghavan; Jill Oliver Robinson; Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby; Lindsay Zausmer Feuerman; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Michael F Murray; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Diversity in the Era of Precision Medicine - From Bench to Bedside Implementation.

Authors:  Abdullah Mamun; Nana Y Nsiah; Meenakshi Srinivasan; Ayyappa Chaturvedula; Riyaz Basha; Deanna Cross; Harlan P Jones; Karabi Nandy; Jamboor K Vishwanatha
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 6.  Physician preparedness for big genomic data: a review of genomic medicine education initiatives in the United States.

Authors:  Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich; Cynthia Cheung; Jess Mandel; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Primary care providers' experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Tutsirai Makuwaza; Donna P Manca; Nicolette Sopcak; Joanne A Permaul; Mary Ann O'Brien; Ruth Heisey; Elizabeth A Eisenhauer; Julie Easley; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Baukje Miedema; Sandhya Pruthi; Carol Sawka; Nancy Schneider; Jonathan Sussman; Robin Urquhart; Catarina Versaevel; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Attitudes of health care professionals toward carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S Janssens; A De Paepe; P Borry
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-12-29

9.  Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Anita O'Connor; Heather Skirton
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-16

Review 10.  Understanding patient and provider perceptions and expectations of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Andrea D Forman; Susan V Montgomery; Kim L Rainey; Mary B Daly
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.