Literature DB >> 27737998

Primary care providers' experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine.

June C Carroll1, Tutsirai Makuwaza2, Donna P Manca3, Nicolette Sopcak4, Joanne A Permaul5, Mary Ann O'Brien6, Ruth Heisey7, Elizabeth A Eisenhauer8, Julie Easley9, Monika K Krzyzanowska10, Baukje Miedema11, Sandhya Pruthi12, Carol Sawka13, Nancy Schneider14, Jonathan Sussman15, Robin Urquhart16, Catarina Versaevel17, Eva Grunfeld18.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess primary care providers' (PCPs') experiences with, perceptions of, and desired role in personalized medicine, with a focus on cancer.
DESIGN: Qualitative study involving focus groups.
SETTING: Urban and rural interprofessional primary care team practices in Alberta and Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one PCPs.
METHODS: Semistructured focus groups were conducted and audiorecorded. Recordings were transcribed and analyzed using techniques informed by grounded theory including coding, interpretations of patterns in the data, and constant comparison. MAIN
FINDINGS: Five focus groups with the 51 participants were conducted; 2 took place in Alberta and 3 in Ontario. Primary care providers described limited experience with personalized medicine, citing breast cancer and prenatal care as main areas of involvement. They expressed concern over their lack of knowledge, in some circumstances relying on personal experiences to inform their attitudes and practice. Participants anticipated an inevitable role in personalized medicine primarily because patients seek and trust their advice; however, there was underlying concern about the magnitude of information and pace of discovery in this area, particularly in direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing. Increased knowledge, closer ties to genetics specialists, and relevant, reliable personalized medicine resources accessible at the point of care were reported as important for successful implementation of personalized medicine.
CONCLUSION: Primary care providers are prepared to discuss personalized medicine, but they require better resources. Models of care that support a more meaningful relationship between PCPs and genetics specialists should be pursued. Continuing education strategies need to address knowledge gaps including direct-to-consumer genetic testing, a relatively new area provoking PCP concern. Primary care providers should be mindful of using personal experiences to guide care. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27737998      PMCID: PMC5063789     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  25 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research articles: information for authors and peer reviewers.

Authors:  M Rowan; P Huston
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Cathelijne H van der Wouden; Deanna Alexis Carere; Anke H Maitland-van der Zee; Mack T Ruffin; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Educational needs of primary care physicians regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Karen P Powell; Carol A Christianson; Whitney A Cogswell; Gaurav Dave; Amit Verma; Sonja Eubanks; Vincent C Henrich
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Making Personalized Health Care Even More Personalized: Insights From Activities of the IOM Genomics Roundtable.

Authors:  Sean P David; Samuel G Johnson; Adam C Berger; W Gregory Feero; Sharon F Terry; Larry A Green; Robert L Phillips; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Primary care physicians' knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  S B Haga; W Burke; G S Ginsburg; R Mills; R Agans
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Genetics education in medical school: a qualitative study exploring educational experiences and needs.

Authors:  Deanna E Telner; June C Carroll; Yves Talbot
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Genetic services for hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancers - physicians' awareness, use and satisfaction.

Authors:  J C Carroll; M Cappelli; F Miller; B J Wilson; E Grunfeld; C Peeters; A G W Hunter; C Gilpin; P Prakash
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2008-01-15

8.  Personalised medicine in Canada: a survey of adoption and practice in oncology, cardiology and family medicine.

Authors:  Katherine Bonter; Clarissa Desjardins; Nathan Currier; Jason Pun; Fredrick D Ashbury
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Factors influencing organizational adoption and implementation of clinical genetic services.

Authors:  Alison B Hamilton; Sabine Oishi; Elizabeth M Yano; Cynthia E Gammage; Nell J Marshall; Maren T Scheuner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Translational research is a key to nongeneticist physicians' genomics education.

Authors:  W Gregory Feero; Teri A Manolio; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  34 in total

1.  Genetic cancer risk assessment in general practice: systematic review of tools available, clinician attitudes, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Flore Laforest; Pia Kirkegaard; Baljinder Mann; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  First Responder to Genomic Information: A Guide for Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Interpretation and management of genetic test results by Canadian family physicians: a multiple choice survey of performance.

Authors:  Stephanie J Skinner; Adam T Clay; Michelle C E McCarron; Sarah Liskowich
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-02-22

Review 4.  Physician preparedness for big genomic data: a review of genomic medicine education initiatives in the United States.

Authors:  Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich; Cynthia Cheung; Jess Mandel; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Yvonne Bombard; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Sarah Patton; Jessica Peace Bytautas; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann; June C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Implementing genetic education in primary care: the Gen-Equip programme.

Authors:  Milena Paneque; Martina C Cornel; Vaclava Curtisova; Elisa Houwink; Leigh Jackson; Alastair Kent; Peter Lunt; Milan Macek; Vigdis Stefansdottir; Daniela Turchetti; Heather Skirton
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-03-13

7.  How Primary Care Providers Talk to Patients about Genome Sequencing Results: Risk, Rationale, and Recommendation.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; J Kelly Davis; Christine Kirby; Ian J Richardson; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Multigene expression profile testing in breast cancer: is there a role for family physicians?

Authors:  M A O'Brien; J C Carroll; D P Manca; B Miedema; P A Groome; T Makuwaza; J Easley; N Sopcak; L Jiang; K Decker; M L McBride; R Moineddin; J A Permaul; R Heisey; E A Eisenhauer; M K Krzyzanowska; S Pruthi; C Sawka; N Schneider; J Sussman; R Urquhart; C Versaevel; E Grunfeld
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  All Along the Watchtower: a Case of Long QT Syndrome Misdiagnosis Secondary to Genetic Testing Misinterpretation.

Authors:  Benjamin M Helm; Mark D Ayers; Adam C Kean
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: Role of primary care providers in caring for infants with positive screening results.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Yvonne Bombard; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Jessica Peace Bytautas; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.